2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00324-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive disparity in schizophrenics with and without cocaine dependency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it is possible that the pre-existing cognitive impairment in schizophrenia is so pronounced that it is minimally impacted by cocaine use. Our data are consistent with a recent metanalysis (Potvin et al, 2008) and several individual studies (e.g., Cooper et al, 1999; Smelson et al, 2003) that have found few cognitive differences between schizophrenia samples with and without a co-occurring SUD. Given the pattern of results in the affective disorder groups, cognitive functioning in patients with affective disorder may also be minimally impacted by cocaine use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, it is possible that the pre-existing cognitive impairment in schizophrenia is so pronounced that it is minimally impacted by cocaine use. Our data are consistent with a recent metanalysis (Potvin et al, 2008) and several individual studies (e.g., Cooper et al, 1999; Smelson et al, 2003) that have found few cognitive differences between schizophrenia samples with and without a co-occurring SUD. Given the pattern of results in the affective disorder groups, cognitive functioning in patients with affective disorder may also be minimally impacted by cocaine use.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Some studies suggest a verbal memory impairment (Serper et al, 2000a; Serper et al, 2000b; Sevy et al, 1990) while others suggest better processing speed (Smelson et al, 2002). Several other studies have found no difference on attention and executive functioning measures (Cooper et al, 1999; Copersino et al, 2004; Serper et al, 2000a; Smelson et al, 2003). Only one study included a brief (18 days) follow up to evaluate change in cognitive functioning during a longer period of abstinence and found few differences between time points (Cooper et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Tobacco and alcohol are the most frequently used substances among people with schizophrenia and in CHR than in the general population (Addington et al, 2014; Buchy et al, in press; de Leon and Diaz, 2005) and have been associated with neurocognitive function in schizophrenia (Morisano et al, 2013; Wing et al, 2011; Yip et al, 2009)(Allen et al, 1999; Cantor-Graae et al, 2001; Fowler et al, 1998; Manning et al, 2009) Stimulant use also has a deleterious effect on cognitive functions in people diagnosed with a psychotic disorder (Bahorik et al, 2014; Serper et al, 2000a; Serper et al, 2000b; Smelson et al, 2003; van der Meer et al, 2014), and other studies have reported elevated neurocognition in people with schizophrenia currently using cocaine (Bahorik et al, 2014; Benaiges et al, 2013). Therefore, these variables must be taken into account when interpreting results of the relationship between cannabis use and IQ across the schizophrenia spectrum.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Sevy, Kay, Opler, and van Praag (1990) showed that cocaine abuse was associated with impaired verbal memory and working memory in patients with schizophrenia. Smelson et al (2003) showed that cocaine abuse was associated with better or worse speed of processing in patients with dual disorders depending on the test used to measure this cognitive domain. On the other hand, two studies failed to detect any differences in cognitive functioning between patients with schizophrenia who abuse cocaine and those who do not (Cooper et al, 1999;Copersino et al, 2004).…”
Section: Cocaine Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%