1998
DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1998.tb01391.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive dissonance 2: A theoretical grounding of motivational interviewing

Abstract: The concept of cognitive dissonance can clearly be seen to be of use in understanding the mechanism of action of MI. It can further be of use in guiding modifications to this existing intervention. This concept, and others available through the experimental psychological literature, can be of use in all branches of clinical psychology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analyses suggest that motivational interviewing might highlight concerns (with the reduction in satisfaction between baseline and 12 months) but also facilitate the patients' perception that they had the capacity to make changes that in turn would lead to reduction in A1C. One possible theoretical explanation for these results could be taken from the work by Draycott and Dabbs (23,24), who mapped the principles of cognitive dissonance onto the principles and method of motivational interviewing. The method of motivational interviewing incorporates the principle of "deploying discrepancy" in which the patients' core values and personal aspirations are contrasted, through empathic listening, with the behavioral problem under discussion.…”
Section: Secondary Outcome Measures: Psychosocial Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our analyses suggest that motivational interviewing might highlight concerns (with the reduction in satisfaction between baseline and 12 months) but also facilitate the patients' perception that they had the capacity to make changes that in turn would lead to reduction in A1C. One possible theoretical explanation for these results could be taken from the work by Draycott and Dabbs (23,24), who mapped the principles of cognitive dissonance onto the principles and method of motivational interviewing. The method of motivational interviewing incorporates the principle of "deploying discrepancy" in which the patients' core values and personal aspirations are contrasted, through empathic listening, with the behavioral problem under discussion.…”
Section: Secondary Outcome Measures: Psychosocial Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…27 Family members may experience cognitive dissonance when they perceive an inconsistency between their preference and what is actually required of them. These observations are consistent with prior fi ndings linking dissonance to physiologic arousal 28 and incongruence in responses to PTSD interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theories can be quite elaborate, or relatively simple. Examples include the theory of reasoned action [41][42][43][44] ; theories of cognitive dissonance [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] ; stages of change [53][54][55] ; Roger's Diffusion of Innovation Theory 32 ; Social Cognitive Theory [56][57][58][59][60][61] ; and Social Influence Theory.…”
Section: Appendix: Defining Terms Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%