2016
DOI: 10.18843/rwjasc/v7i2/06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Dissonance: A Review of Causes and Marketing Implications

Abstract: Limitations-This study tried to focus on the past research in the marketing context, hence other aspects of management and psychology may have been not addressed. The categorization of the past studies done clearly brings out the areas which remains under explored and gives way for future research in the organizational contexts as well as industrial purchases. Organizational Culture and its effect on Cognitive Dissonance among its consumers may also be studied for the benefit of marketers. Enough studies perta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 66 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such involved purchase experiences are expected to evoke more dissonance-induced negative emotions (Olejniczak, 2017). Planned and elaborate decision-making will lead to a higher degree of emotional discrepancy if the consumer expectations are not met, in which case they display greater negative emotions (Bolia et al, 2016). On the other hand, a low involvement purchase is expected to be vulnerable to the consumer's selection bias and low choice confidence leading to lower expected performance and suppressed negative emotions (Gbadamosi, 2009).…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such involved purchase experiences are expected to evoke more dissonance-induced negative emotions (Olejniczak, 2017). Planned and elaborate decision-making will lead to a higher degree of emotional discrepancy if the consumer expectations are not met, in which case they display greater negative emotions (Bolia et al, 2016). On the other hand, a low involvement purchase is expected to be vulnerable to the consumer's selection bias and low choice confidence leading to lower expected performance and suppressed negative emotions (Gbadamosi, 2009).…”
Section: F I G U R E 1 Conceptual Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%