2020
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2020.2970280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Dwell Time Allocation for Distributed Radar Sensor Networks Tracking via Cone Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several works focus on power and dwell time allocation in CRNs [21], [22], [23]. These works consider CRNs sharing a single channel, which must allocate the limited observation time to the nodes of the networks.…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works focus on power and dwell time allocation in CRNs [21], [22], [23]. These works consider CRNs sharing a single channel, which must allocate the limited observation time to the nodes of the networks.…”
Section: Organizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to increased maneuvering characteristics, electronic countermeasures and the complexity of electromagnetic environment [1], there are many problems such as strong maneuvering characteristics, high filtering, multiple interference and increasing problems due to inefficiencies in checking [2]. Single target tracking is no longer able to adapt to the growing tracking requirements [3], which can result in incomplete measurements from optoelectronic tracking systems [4]. This results in wild and missing values in the sensor measurements, which increases the difficulty of estimating the target state in the information [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time resource allocation is performed using kinematic estimation and prediction of target state parameters. Resource management solutions found in the literature mainly use the predicted states covariance matrix [3, 4], its expectation bound – Bayesian Cramer‐Rao lower bound (BCRLB) [5], the posterior CRLB (PCRLB) [6, 7] and predicted conditional CRLB (PC‐CRLB) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%