1994
DOI: 10.1177/009155219402200102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Effects of Two-Year and Four-Year Institutions: A Preliminary Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An institution's faculty and staff typically conduct these efforts on their own students, although some institutions have collaborated in using the same measures to assess learning outcomes. The latter strategy allows institutions and policy makers to compare institutions (Obler, Slark and Umbdenstock, 1993;Bohr et al, 1994;and Pascarella et al, 1996). A few states have required that all institutions use the same standardized multiple-choice tests to assess student knowledge, skills, and abilities (Cole, Nettles and Sharp, 1997;Naughton, Suen and Shavelson, 2003;NCHEMS, 1996;Steele and Lutz, 1995).…”
Section: Direct Assessments Of Student Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An institution's faculty and staff typically conduct these efforts on their own students, although some institutions have collaborated in using the same measures to assess learning outcomes. The latter strategy allows institutions and policy makers to compare institutions (Obler, Slark and Umbdenstock, 1993;Bohr et al, 1994;and Pascarella et al, 1996). A few states have required that all institutions use the same standardized multiple-choice tests to assess student knowledge, skills, and abilities (Cole, Nettles and Sharp, 1997;Naughton, Suen and Shavelson, 2003;NCHEMS, 1996;Steele and Lutz, 1995).…”
Section: Direct Assessments Of Student Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this work has advanced the general understanding of religious life during college, institutional‐level influences have largely gone unexamined. Research has established that institutional differences in sector, religious affiliation, and status as a liberal arts or research university shape student change in diverse areas such as cognitive growth (Bohr and Pascarella 1994; Bohr et al 1995), moral development (Good and Cartwright 1998; McNeel 1994), and economic earnings (Monks 2000). Nevertheless, these institutional effects have received little attention in the realm of religious outcomes (but see Uecker (2008) for institutional effects of secondary schooling on religiosity), despite the commitment of many religious colleges and universities to impact the religious lives of students.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%