2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.02.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive-emotional networks in students with and without a history of non-suicidal self-injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, it has been stated that individuals who criticize themselves for not meeting high standards and experiencing low self-esteem are more likely to self-harm [114]. In accordance with this, it has been reported in the literature that individuals with a history of SHB have higher negative and lower positive characteristics, more emotional reactivity, psychological distress, difficulties in managing negative emotions, and negative schemas [108,[115][116][117][118].…”
Section: Individual Psychological Factorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In contrast, it has been stated that individuals who criticize themselves for not meeting high standards and experiencing low self-esteem are more likely to self-harm [114]. In accordance with this, it has been reported in the literature that individuals with a history of SHB have higher negative and lower positive characteristics, more emotional reactivity, psychological distress, difficulties in managing negative emotions, and negative schemas [108,[115][116][117][118].…”
Section: Individual Psychological Factorsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Prior research has investigated the correlation between NSSI and variables, including "catastrophic" (a non-adaptive regulatory strategy) factors [ 26 , 27 ]. As per the cognitive-emotion paradigm, individuals who experience strong negative emotions, find it difficult to regulate these feelings, and perceive NSSI as a beneficial method for handling these emotions are more likely to engage in NSSI [ 28 ]. According to Nock and Prinstein's theoretical framework, NSSI are maladaptive coping strategies employed to regulate distressing thoughts or emotions through means such as evasion, avoidance, substitution, or direct alteration [ 29 31 ].…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During this process, negative cognition, acting as a cognitive factor, can excessively draw individuals' attention to their own bad emotional states, which may be the primary catalyst for engaging in NSSI behavior [ 34 ]. Simultaneously, those with negative cognitive styles perceive negative feelings as inappropriate and hold themselves accountable for experiencing such emotions [ 28 ]. Consequently, individuals with negative cognitive styles struggle to find efficient methods to handle or prevent intense unpleasant emotions, leading them to resort to avoidance strategies [ 35 ].…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the cognitive-emotional model, if individuals are highly reactive to negative emotions, encounter difficulties in regulating these emotions, and recognize NSSI as an effective strategy for regulating these emotions, then they are more likely to engage in NSSI. On the contrary, those who believe they can endure pain, resist the urge to NSSI, and use other strategies to manage emotions are less likely to engage in NSSI 65 . The benefits and barriers model holds a similar opinion that NSSI may provide a range of benefits, including self-punishment benefit, affective benefit, communication benefit, and affiliation benefit, but most people are unable to obtain benefits from NSSI because of barriers, including awareness, aversion, pain, positive self, and social norms 51 .…”
Section: Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%