Adult male Long-Evans rats were trained to run in a straight-alley maze for food reward and subsequently received hippocampus-dependent latent extinction training. Immediately following latent extinction, rats received peripheral injections of the NMDA receptor partial agonist D-cycloserine (DCS, 15 mg/kg), or saline. Twenty-four hours later, rats received four extinction "probe" trials. Relative to saline controls, latencies to reach the goal box on probe trials were significantly higher in rats that had received DCS. These findings indicate that memory consolidation underlying hippocampus-dependent latent extinction, a cognitive form of learning in which the previously rewarded response is not made during extinction training, can be enhanced by NMDA-receptor agonism.Behavioral extinction is operationalized as a reduction of a previously acquired response, and this process can involve new learning (for review, see Bouton 2004). The initial acquisition of learned behavior involves multiple memory systems (for review, see Packard 2001) and we have recently expanded this view to the study of the new learning underlying behavioral extinction (Gabriele and Packard 2006). We used a task in which extinction of the same overt behavior could be achieved using either a "response" or "latent" extinction training procedure. In contrast to typical extinction training that involves performance of a previously reinforced response, during latent extinction training no overt response is made. For example, a food-rewarded approach response in a straight-alley maze can be extinguished by placing the animal in the goal box in the absence of reward (Seward and Levy 1949). Consistent with the hypothesis that multiple memory systems play a role in the learning that occurs during extinction, we observed that the learning underlying response and latent extinction of runway behavior is neuroanatomically dissociable. Specifically, neural inactivation of the hippocampus prevented latent extinction of maze runway behavior, but did not block response extinction of the same behavior (Gabriele and Packard 2006). Latent extinction is conducive to a cognitive learning process in which an expectancy (Tolman 1932) of food reward can be altered without performance of the previously acquired response (Seward and Levy 1949). According to the multiple memory systems hypothesis, the hippocampus is selectively involved in cognitive learning and memory (e.g., Hirsh 1974;Mishkin and Petri 1984), and the impairment of latent extinction produced by hippocampal inactivation is consistent with this view.Although our previous study using a reversible lesion technique implicates the hippocampus in latent extinction, the findings do not provide any information concerning the neurochemical basis of this form of cognitive learning. Various neurotransmitter systems play a role in extinction (for review, see Mason 1983) and several recent studies have focused on the role of glutamatergic neurotransmission (for review, see Davis and Myers 2002). For example, adminis...