“…Step 2—Intervention selection: The most common method used to inform selection of interventions involved positioning the traditional evidence alongside scientific evidence, contemporary texts and/or expert opinion to draw comparisons, validate evidence or develop a ‘totality of evidence’ (Adams et al, 2007, 2011; Adams, Schneider, et al, 2012; Arabshahi et al, 2015; Bae et al, 2019; Buentzel et al, 2020; Chen et al, 2015; Choi et al, 2015; De Vos, 2010; Fatali, Emami, et al, 2020; Fatali, Sadeghpour, et al, 2020; Guo‐Jing et al, 2020; Han et al, 2017; Lardos et al, 2011; Leach et al, 2018; May et al, 2016; Pae et al, 2016; Park et al, 2018; Petran et al, 2020; Sahranavard et al, 2014; Steel & Adams, 2011b; Thomas, 2011; Watkins et al, 2012; Xia et al, 2020; Yang et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2014). It was also common for selection processes to place importance on TK with greater predominance in traditional sources, such as interventions appearing frequently within or across sources, and those with consistency of use over time as proxy measures for safety and potential efficacy (Alizadeh et al, 2017; Bae et al, 2019; Birch & Sherman, 1999; Buentzel et al, 2020; Chen et al, 2015, 2020; Connelly et al, 2020; De Vos, 2010; Flatt, 2016; Guo‐Jing et al, 2020; Han et al, 2017; Lardos et al, 2011; May et al, 2014; Sahranavard et al, 2014; Steel & Adams, 2011c; Thomas, 2011; Xia et al, 2020; Zhang et al, 2014).…”