2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive flexibility assessment in youth with Down syndrome: Reliability, practice effects, and validity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Good reliability criteria of ICC > 0.75 were set a priori, with values 0.50 to 0.75 indicating moderate reliability (Koo & Li 2016; Schworer et al . 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Good reliability criteria of ICC > 0.75 were set a priori, with values 0.50 to 0.75 indicating moderate reliability (Koo & Li 2016; Schworer et al . 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preliminary evaluation of test-retest reliability was conducted with a two-way random-effects intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the subgroup of participants who completed the assessment again 2 weeks later. Good reliability criteria of ICC > 0.75 were set a priori, with values 0.50 to 0.75 indicating moderate reliability (Koo & Li 2016;Schworer et al 2023).…”
Section: Analysis Planmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations