2020
DOI: 10.1093/nop/npaa072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive impact of lower-grade gliomas and strategies for rehabilitation

Abstract: Outcomes for patients with lower grade gliomas (LrGG) continue to improve with advances in molecular characterization and treatment. However, cognitive sequela from the tumor and its treatment leave a significant impact on health related quality of life for these patients. Several factors affect each patient’s cognition, such as tumor location, treatment, medication, and co-morbidities. However, impairments of processing speed, attention, concentration, working memory, and executive function are common across … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 111 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the emerging research for the use of cognitive rehabilitation for addressing cognitive and QoL concerns in LrGG (50)(51)(52)(53), this study underscores the value of including cognitive and QoL assessments as part of LrGG care, as well as highlighting the groundwork needed to refine cognitive treatments. More specifically, while still in its infancy for use in LrGG, cognitive rehabilitation models may want to consider how clinical factors such as age, T2 FLAIR volumes, tumor molecular characteristics, and treatment effects may jointly influence treatment response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Given the emerging research for the use of cognitive rehabilitation for addressing cognitive and QoL concerns in LrGG (50)(51)(52)(53), this study underscores the value of including cognitive and QoL assessments as part of LrGG care, as well as highlighting the groundwork needed to refine cognitive treatments. More specifically, while still in its infancy for use in LrGG, cognitive rehabilitation models may want to consider how clinical factors such as age, T2 FLAIR volumes, tumor molecular characteristics, and treatment effects may jointly influence treatment response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Above all, not only postsurgical scores but also reaction times have a predictive value regarding the return to a normal life: indeed,lexical access speed was significantly linked to the capacity to resume professional activities ( 31 ). Thus, to improve postoperative outcomes, beyond new programs of neurocognitive rehabilitation aiming at facilitating the recovery of higher-order functions such as attention, memory or mental fatigue ( 32 34 ), a paradigmatic shift in the intraoperative functional mapping “à la carte” has recently been proposed ( 9 ).…”
Section: The Need To Improve Long-term Functional Outcomes In Lgg Pat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With modern treatment regimes, patients with LGGs may survive for many years. If they are exposed to morbidity from surgery, this can lead to long-term disability and reduced quality of life [ 63 , 64 , 65 ]; the need for safe resection with minimisation of resulting neurological deficit is therefore of paramount importance.…”
Section: Limitations Of 5-alamentioning
confidence: 99%