2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Impairment, Functional Outcome, and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been 25 years since Hütter and Gilsbach highlighted that six months post-aSAH, neuropsychological deficits were frequent even among SAH patients that seemed to fare well. [6] Since then, similar findings have been reported by several other research groups [11,34,35]. However, we found only one study that evaluated the incidence of NPDs in patients with favorable functional outcome at the early stages after aSAH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been 25 years since Hütter and Gilsbach highlighted that six months post-aSAH, neuropsychological deficits were frequent even among SAH patients that seemed to fare well. [6] Since then, similar findings have been reported by several other research groups [11,34,35]. However, we found only one study that evaluated the incidence of NPDs in patients with favorable functional outcome at the early stages after aSAH.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The sensitivity for milder NPDs is reportedly high, and the tool has therefore been graded as superior to other commonly used cognitive screening tools, such as MMSE [19,26]. In fact, in the recent study of 337 aSAH patients, Eagles et al [35] concluded that although MMSE scores varied in favorable outcome patients (mRS 0-2) 12 weeks after aSAH, more sensitive variables, [20,27,36]. The first study revealed a low association between the MoCA (measured at a subacute phase (2-4 weeks) after aSAH) and unfavorable functional outcome (mRS 3-5) at one year [36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loss of productive life years due to aSAH is as great as that for cerebral infarction because it frequently affects patients younger than 65 years of age (3). Delayed ischemic neurological deficit (DIND) complicates aSAH in one-third of cases and is a strong risk factor for unfavorable neurological outcomes, defining an unmet need for therapeutic innovation (4,5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is caused by rupture of an intracranial aneurysm and leads to significant long-term morbidity. As many cases of aSAH occur at a relatively young age with peak incidence at 55 years of age, many survivors are faced with limitations in their everyday life for decades [1][2][3][4]. Besides physical impairments, neuropsychological deficits have been recognized as one of the main factors affecting patient's quality of life; however, even though many outcome assessment tools like the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the Mini-Mental Status Evaluation (MMSE), different memory tests like the Wechsler Memory Scale or the California Verbal Learning Test as well as tests of executive function, such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task, have been evaluated, it has been difficult to recognize subtle cognitive deficits by means of gross neurological measures [5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%