Abstract:Cognitive impairment exists in both subtypes of bipolar disorder, although more so in the bipolar I group. The best predictors of poor psychosocial functioning in bipolar II disorder were subclinical depressive symptoms, early onset of illness and poor performance on a measure related to executive function.
“…Three studies using this test did not find impaired BD II patients (Summers et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Savitz et al 2008). However, Torrent et al (2006) found that BD II patients, as well as BD I patients, showed a trend towards a higher number of perseverative errors compared with HCs, which may also be related to greater impulsivity.…”
Section: Cognitive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three studies using this test did not find impaired BD II patients (Summers et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Savitz et al 2008). However, Torrent et al (2006) found that BD II patients, as well as BD I patients, showed a trend towards a higher number of perseverative errors compared with HCs, which may also be related to greater impulsivity. In two studies, cognitive flexibility was evaluated with another measure, the Intra-Dimensional/Extra-Dimensional Set-Shift subtest from CANTAB, with contradictory results ; one of them found that unmedicated BD II depressed subjects demonstrated intact performance (Taylor Tavares et al 2007) and the other found that BD II patients scored significantly lower than BD I patients (Summers et al 2006).…”
Section: Cognitive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding phonemic verbal fluency, five out of six studies did not find a deficit in BD II patients (Summers et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Andersson et al 2008 ;Savitz et al 2008 ;Simonsen et al 2008), while Harkavy-Friedman et al (2006) pointed out that BD II patients had a worse performance than HC subjects in this task. It is also important to underline that BD II subjects in the latter study were depressed, so this finding may be related to findings reported by Martínez-Arán et al (2002, 2004b where the only significant difference between euthymic patients and depressed patients was observed in verbal fluency, suggesting that performance in the phonemic fluency task may be state-dependent.…”
Section: Verbal Fluencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies out of five did not find differences between the BD II and HC groups (Harkavy-Friedman et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Hsiao et al 2009). In the study by Summers et al (2006) BD II patients were not impaired with respect to the normative data on the TMT-B, although they scored significantly lower than BD I participants on this measure.…”
Section: Cognitive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies with samples formed of euthymic patients or patients with mild or residual symptomatology, deficits in some working memory measures were detected (Summers et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Andersson et al 2008 ;Dittmann et al 2008 ;Simonsen et al 2008 ;Hsiao et al 2009). In this regard, Summers et al (2006) found that BD II patients were significantly more impaired than BD I patients.…”
Background. There is evidence that bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with significant neurocognitive deficits and this occurs in individuals with BD type I (BD I) and with BD type II (BD II). Only a few studies have focused on cognitive impairment in BD II. The aim of this study was to describe the pattern of cognitive impairment in patients with BD II, in order to identify specific cognitive deficits that distinguish BD II from BD I patients as well as from healthy subjects.Method. We performed a systematic review of the literature of neuropsychological studies of BD II published between 1980 and July 2009. Fourteen articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this review.Results. Main cognitive deficits found in BD II include working memory and some measures of executive functions (inhibitory control) and approximately half of the studies also detected verbal memory impairment.Conclusions. There are subtle differences between the two subtypes regarding cognition. This may suggest neurobiological differences between the two subgroups which will be helpful in order to determine cognitive endophenotypes in BD subtypes.
“…Three studies using this test did not find impaired BD II patients (Summers et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Savitz et al 2008). However, Torrent et al (2006) found that BD II patients, as well as BD I patients, showed a trend towards a higher number of perseverative errors compared with HCs, which may also be related to greater impulsivity.…”
Section: Cognitive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Three studies using this test did not find impaired BD II patients (Summers et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Savitz et al 2008). However, Torrent et al (2006) found that BD II patients, as well as BD I patients, showed a trend towards a higher number of perseverative errors compared with HCs, which may also be related to greater impulsivity. In two studies, cognitive flexibility was evaluated with another measure, the Intra-Dimensional/Extra-Dimensional Set-Shift subtest from CANTAB, with contradictory results ; one of them found that unmedicated BD II depressed subjects demonstrated intact performance (Taylor Tavares et al 2007) and the other found that BD II patients scored significantly lower than BD I patients (Summers et al 2006).…”
Section: Cognitive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding phonemic verbal fluency, five out of six studies did not find a deficit in BD II patients (Summers et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Andersson et al 2008 ;Savitz et al 2008 ;Simonsen et al 2008), while Harkavy-Friedman et al (2006) pointed out that BD II patients had a worse performance than HC subjects in this task. It is also important to underline that BD II subjects in the latter study were depressed, so this finding may be related to findings reported by Martínez-Arán et al (2002, 2004b where the only significant difference between euthymic patients and depressed patients was observed in verbal fluency, suggesting that performance in the phonemic fluency task may be state-dependent.…”
Section: Verbal Fluencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three studies out of five did not find differences between the BD II and HC groups (Harkavy-Friedman et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Hsiao et al 2009). In the study by Summers et al (2006) BD II patients were not impaired with respect to the normative data on the TMT-B, although they scored significantly lower than BD I participants on this measure.…”
Section: Cognitive Flexibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies with samples formed of euthymic patients or patients with mild or residual symptomatology, deficits in some working memory measures were detected (Summers et al 2006 ;Torrent et al 2006 ;Andersson et al 2008 ;Dittmann et al 2008 ;Simonsen et al 2008 ;Hsiao et al 2009). In this regard, Summers et al (2006) found that BD II patients were significantly more impaired than BD I patients.…”
Background. There is evidence that bipolar disorder (BD) is associated with significant neurocognitive deficits and this occurs in individuals with BD type I (BD I) and with BD type II (BD II). Only a few studies have focused on cognitive impairment in BD II. The aim of this study was to describe the pattern of cognitive impairment in patients with BD II, in order to identify specific cognitive deficits that distinguish BD II from BD I patients as well as from healthy subjects.Method. We performed a systematic review of the literature of neuropsychological studies of BD II published between 1980 and July 2009. Fourteen articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in this review.Results. Main cognitive deficits found in BD II include working memory and some measures of executive functions (inhibitory control) and approximately half of the studies also detected verbal memory impairment.Conclusions. There are subtle differences between the two subtypes regarding cognition. This may suggest neurobiological differences between the two subgroups which will be helpful in order to determine cognitive endophenotypes in BD subtypes.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.