2014
DOI: 10.17116/jnevro201411411210-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive impairment in depression and potential applications of antidepressants with procognitive effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of an inverse correlation between VAS values and cough monitoring device data indicates that in patients with COPD and anxiety/depression, critical thinking and assessment of their condition, in particular, of cough, is impaired. It is known that depression leads to a so-called “depressive shift” that affects the sphere of attention, thinking, memory, and prediction and it makes an assessment of a physical condition more difficult [28]. The analysis and synthesis of information is disturbed, one-sided, and incomplete, and negative and pessimistic views take over.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of an inverse correlation between VAS values and cough monitoring device data indicates that in patients with COPD and anxiety/depression, critical thinking and assessment of their condition, in particular, of cough, is impaired. It is known that depression leads to a so-called “depressive shift” that affects the sphere of attention, thinking, memory, and prediction and it makes an assessment of a physical condition more difficult [28]. The analysis and synthesis of information is disturbed, one-sided, and incomplete, and negative and pessimistic views take over.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determination of sample size was based on the primary endpoint, namely the incongruent reading speed in the Stroop Color and Word Test. From our previous work [29], it is known that the standard deviation of this parameter is 5.94 s and that the minimum clinically significant difference in the test is 5 s. From this, specifying a significance level of 5% and a statistical power of 80% in a two-tailed test, a minimum per-protocol sample size estimate of 35 was derived. This was increased to 43 to reflect the fact that the outcome variable does not follow a normal distribution and the overall sample size for the intention-to-treat population was set to 50 subjects.…”
Section: Statistical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%