2001
DOI: 10.1176/appi.psy.42.1.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Improvement With Treatment of Depression Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
124
1
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
124
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, successful treatment of depression might ameliorate some aspects of cognitive dysfunction, as it has been reported in patients with traumatic brain injury. 36,38 Nevertheless, the clinicians must be aware of the burden secondary to cognitive impairment and depression in MS subjects providing prompt diagnosis and treatment, considering both pharmacological and nonpharmacological (rehabilitation, psychotherapy) approaches.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, successful treatment of depression might ameliorate some aspects of cognitive dysfunction, as it has been reported in patients with traumatic brain injury. 36,38 Nevertheless, the clinicians must be aware of the burden secondary to cognitive impairment and depression in MS subjects providing prompt diagnosis and treatment, considering both pharmacological and nonpharmacological (rehabilitation, psychotherapy) approaches.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fann et al reported an 87 percent response rate in an 8-week, singleblind placebo run-in trial of sertraline 25 to 200 mg/d in 15 subjects with major depression 3 to 24 months follow-ing mild TBI [99]. They further reported improved psychomotor speed, recent verbal and visual memory, and cognitive efficiency with sertraline treatment, associated with significant improvement in depression scores [100].…”
Section: Ssrismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study with a pre-post design (Fann, Uomoto et al 2001) found a large positive effect, however the effects were less favourable in the controlled trials with one study suggesting that sertraline was less effective than placebo ) and the other showed the effect to be no greater than zero (Lee, Kim et al 2005) The most obvious difference between these studies is that Fann et al, (2001) used a pre-post design and only evaluated the effect of the placebo treatment over 1 week rather than a period equivalent to active treatment. Furthermore, there were differences in time since injury across the three studies from approximately 1 month post-injury (Lee, Kim et al 2005), 3-24 months post injury (Fann, Uomoto et al 2001) and 17 years (on average) post-injury ). In both controlled trials, however, the placebo group also showed a significant improvement over the treatment period, suggesting that the other factors (e.g., contact with clinic staff) rather than the active treatment may be responsible for the improvement in symptoms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Figure 2, when examining the pharmacological treatments, the greatest positive effect was found for the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) sertraline (Fann, Uomoto et al 2001). Two similar sized trials of sertraline (Lee, Kim et ) while the third had a maximum dose of 100 mg/week (Lee, Kim et al 2005).…”
Section: Insert Table 2 and Figure 2 Around Herementioning
confidence: 99%