2016
DOI: 10.1080/14794713.2016.1227603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive load and live coding: a comparison with improvisation using traditional instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Designing live coding mini-languages is a delicate balance between simplicity and flexibility. Live coding practice has been shown to require high cognitive load from performers, making it more challenging compared with instrumental performance (Sayer 2016). Fluency in touch typing can help alleviate some of this cognitive load, but it still requires a high level of conscious decision-making.…”
Section: Performance Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Designing live coding mini-languages is a delicate balance between simplicity and flexibility. Live coding practice has been shown to require high cognitive load from performers, making it more challenging compared with instrumental performance (Sayer 2016). Fluency in touch typing can help alleviate some of this cognitive load, but it still requires a high level of conscious decision-making.…”
Section: Performance Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%