1994
DOI: 10.1016/0911-6044(94)90005-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive load and the processing of grammatical items

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At first glance, this result is surprising because it suggests a possible overlap between language control and nonverbal control mechanisms not observed in AMBA; however, upon closer inspection, it appears that it might capture the multi-step process intrinsic to the language control task. Managing semantic processes and language comprehension activates language centers, as well as areas responsible for domain general cognitive processing [89][90][91]. There is evidence that in addition to language processing, the left inferior frontal gyrus is recruited to complete semantically ambiguous tasks [92] and verbal and nonverbal cognitive tasks [93], including task selection [94], suggesting that that it is connected to a domain general cognitive network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first glance, this result is surprising because it suggests a possible overlap between language control and nonverbal control mechanisms not observed in AMBA; however, upon closer inspection, it appears that it might capture the multi-step process intrinsic to the language control task. Managing semantic processes and language comprehension activates language centers, as well as areas responsible for domain general cognitive processing [89][90][91]. There is evidence that in addition to language processing, the left inferior frontal gyrus is recruited to complete semantically ambiguous tasks [92] and verbal and nonverbal cognitive tasks [93], including task selection [94], suggesting that that it is connected to a domain general cognitive network.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este supuesto también podría relacionarse con el bajo desempeño que presentó el paciente en algunas subpruebas de lenguaje, es decir, que las dificultades en este dominio podrían deberse a la complejidad del estímulo presentado (que aumentan la carga cognitiva). El análisis presentado por Tesak (1994), sobre los efectos de la carga cognitiva en tareas de lenguaje en pacientes afásicos, apunta a que, semejante a lo encontrado en el paciente del presente estudio, el éxito en las actividades más simples y la falla en las más complejas puede ser un problema computacional más que estructural (o de la condición de base de los pacientes).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified