2012
DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive neuroenhancement: false assumptions in the ethical debate

Abstract: The present work critically examines two assumptions frequently stated by supporters of cognitive neuroenhancement. The first, explicitly methodological, assumption is the supposition of effective and side effect-free neuroenhancers. However, there is an evidence-based concern that the most promising drugs currently used for cognitive enhancement can be addictive. Furthermore, this work describes why the neuronal correlates of key cognitive concepts, such as learning and memory, are so deeply connected with me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consensus about the propriety of brain enhancement is elusive [4,[8][9][10][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. One way of approaching the issue is to query the public about their enthusiasms and concerns with regard to enhancement of human brains [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consensus about the propriety of brain enhancement is elusive [4,[8][9][10][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. One way of approaching the issue is to query the public about their enthusiasms and concerns with regard to enhancement of human brains [21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive enhancement is a popular topic, attracting attention both from the general public and the scientific community (Eickenhorst et al, 2012;Heinz et al, 2012). Prescription stimulants such as methylphenidate and amphetamines are the most frequently consumed smart drugs, especially in college campuses (Franke et al, 2014;Franke et al, 2011;McCabe et al, 2014;Teter et al, 2010;Wilens et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to effectiveness, results of the limited number of laboratory studies do not allow to draw reasonable conclusions for everyday situations (Outram, 2010: 199;Lucke et al, 2011: 40). Based on theoretical considerations about mechanisms responsible for addiction, Heinz et al (2012) conclude that negative consequences of enhancement are being underestimated in the ethical debate. Without in-depth empirical research, the assumption of safe enhancement-methods remains rather speculative (Heinz et al, 2012: 374).…”
Section: The Next Step: From Ethics To Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%