Cognitive neuroscience of bodily representations: Psychological processes and neural mechanisms

Jackson, Stephen R.; Buxbaum, Laurel J.; Coslett, H. Branch

doi:10.1080/17588928.2011.630723

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Disorders of body representation may be of psychopathological origin or a consequence of central neurological damage. A careful analysis of the literature [1][2][3][4][5][6] shows an unclear distinction between body schema and body image.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of an integrated rehabilitative treatment on the modification of body representation in patients affected by Unilateral Spatial Neglect

Falso¹,

Delpero²,

Cattaneo³

2018

J Nov Physiother Rehabil

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In line with the so-called "embodiment concept", human bodily experience is characterized by the immediate feeling that our body is localized in a certain position in space and that the self is localized within these body limits. Aim: To verify in a cohort of patients affected by unilateral spatial neglect (NSU) secondary to cerebrovascular damage the possible correlation between a comprehensive neuromotor/ neuropsychological rehabilitative treatment and the modifi cation of body representation. Setting: A rehabilitation institute for the treatment of neurological gait disorders and neuropsychological failures. Methods: 12 patients (7 males, 5 females; mean age 60 ± 2yy) affected by NSU secondary to cerebral stroke and recovered in the Neurological Rehabilitation Section of the Clinical Institute Città di Brescia were recruited for the aim of this study. In accordance with our inclusion criteria we recruited 4 patients affected by ischemic stroke and 8 patients affected by haemorragic stroke; 9 patients of our study group arrived from a coma state period. Recruited patients underwent at time T0 (hospitalization day) to a functional impairment evaluation (Motricity Index = MI; Trunk Control Test = TCT; Functional Ambulation Category = FAC) and to a neuropsychological evaluation (Behavioural Inattention Test = BIT; Representional drawing; Personal Neglect evaluation scale); each evaluation was repeated in the same way at time T1 (intertime between 2 and 4 months after hospitalization) and time T2 (inter time between 5 and 6 months after hospitalization). At time T0 each patient began an individualized integrated (motor and neuropsychological) rehabilitative treatment course. Results: In all patients recruited a statistical signifi cant modifi cation was observed for the MI LL left, the TCT and the FAC; no signifi cant statistical modifi cation was observed for the MI UL left, the MI UL and the MI LL right. The t-test showed a signifi cant statistical modifi cation of the personal neglect evaluation scale while no signifi cant statistical modifi cation was defi ned for the spontaneous human fi gure drawing test proceeding from time T0 to time T1. The spontaneous drawing of the human fi gure showed an individual different trend and modifi cation in all patients recruited. A correlation analysis was made comparing the mean value of all motor scales (G1) with the mean value of all neuropsychological scales (G2) and no statistical signifi cant correlation was observed between G1 (T0) and G1 (T1), G1 (T0) and G2 (T0), G1 (T0) and G2 (T1), G2 (T0) and G1 (T1), G2 (T0) and G2 (T1), G1 (T1) and G2 (T1). A second correlation analysis was made comparing all single motor scales with the neuropsychological scales, for the group made by 12 patients and the group made by 5 patients. For the group made by 12 patients, we observed the subsequently signifi cant correlations: MI UL left (T0) correlates with MI LL left (T0); MI LL left (T0) correlates with MI LL left (T1); MI UL left (T1) correlates with MI LL left (T1); M...

show abstract