Cognitive predictors of a common multitasking ability: Contributions from working memory, attention control, and fluid intelligence.

Abstract

Previous research has identified several cognitive abilities that are important for multitasking, but few studies have attempted to measure a general multitasking ability using a diverse set of multitasks. In the final dataset, 534 young adult subjects completed measures of working memory (WM), attention control, fluid intelligence, and multitasking. Correlations, hierarchical regression analyses, confirmatory factor analyses, structural equation models, and relative weight analyses revealed several key findings. First, although the complex tasks used to assess multitasking differed greatly in their task characteristics and demands, a coherent construct specific to multitasking ability was identified. Second, the cognitive ability predictors accounted for substantial variance in the general multitasking construct, with WM and fluid intelligence accounting for the most multitasking variance compared to attention control. Third, the magnitude of the relationships among the cognitive abilities and multitasking varied as a function of the complexity and structure of the various multitasks assessed. Finally, structural equation models based on a multifaceted model of WM indicated that attention control and capacity fully mediated the WM and multitasking relationship. (PsycINFO Database Record

Time takes space: selective effects of multitasking on concurrent spatial processing

“…First, a central assumption of our framework, which we have emphasized in earlier work (Mäntylä and Todorov 2013; Todorov et al 2015), is that expertise and executive control functioning are the primary sources for individual differences in multitasking. Experts are better than nonexperts in handling multiple tasks (e.g., air traffic control, Loukopoulos et al 2009; Wickens 2008; preparing a breakfast in one’s own kitchen), and individuals with efficient executive functions are typically better multitaskers than individuals with less efficient control functions (Redick et al 2016; Shallice and Burgess 1991). However, in many novel or unfamiliar situations, overlearned scripts and schematic knowledge structures are not relevant (or even interfering) for handling executively demanding task coordination (cf.…”

Is executive control related to working memory capacity and fluid intelligence?

“…The presence of the lure required participants to focus on the cued locations only. Kane et al (2016); Redick et al (2016) Disengage In a first phase, participants were presented with a red square frame with a gap along with three more differently colored square frames. After some time, all square frames were masked with color patches, and participants were asked to report the direction of the gap.…”

“…Keye et al (2009Keye et al ( , 2010Keye et al ( , 2013; Klauer et al (2010) Spatial Stroop Participants were instructed to ignore the location of an arrow in order to respond to the direction pointed by the arrow. Kane et al (2016); Pettigrew & Martin (2014); Redick et al (2016) Task Description Studies (examples) Stop-signal* Participants performed an ongoing task (e.g., a word categorization) unless the stop-signal (i.e., a tone or a change in color frame) occurred. In this case, they had to withhold their responses.…”

Developing and Validating a Virtual Reality Tool for Evaluating Cognitive and Physical Performance during a Simulated Loaded March

“…Thus, working memory was required in all the VR-COG tasks. Indeed, strong relationships between working memory and multitasking have been documented in the past (34,35), and specifically working memory was found related to the performance on the SYNWIN battery (34).…”