Cognitive Processes in Language

Kosecki, Krzysztof; Badio, Janusz

doi:10.3726/978-3-653-04562-8

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Some well-known examples of gamification include Fitbit [13], Apple Watch [14], Nike+ [15], Khan Academy [16], Wikipedia [17], Stack Overflow [18], Lyft [19], and many others. Although successful with some subgroups of people, these gamification systems all fail at engaging people for an extended period [20].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of In-Game Rewards to Motivate Daily Self-Report Compliance: Randomized Controlled Trial

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Encouraging individuals to report daily information such as unpleasant disease symptoms, daily activities and behaviors, or aspects of their physical and emotional state is difficult but necessary for many studies and clinical trials that rely on patient-reported data as primary outcomes. Use of paper diaries is the traditional method of completing daily diaries, but digital surveys are becoming the new standard because of their increased compliance; however, they still fall short of desired compliance levels. Objective Mobile games using in-game rewards offer the opportunity to increase compliance above the rates of digital diaries and paper diaries. We conducted a 5-week randomized control trial to compare the completion rates of a daily diary across 3 conditions: a paper-based participant-reported outcome diary (Paper PRO), an electronic-based participant-reported outcome diary (ePRO), and a novel ePRO diary with in-game rewards (Game-Motivated ePRO). Methods We developed a novel mobile game that is a combination of the idle and pet collection genres to reward individuals who complete a daily diary with an in-game reward. Overall, 197 individuals aged 6 to 24 years (male: 100 and female: 97) were enrolled in a 5-week study after being randomized into 1 of the 3 methods of daily diary completion. Moreover, 157 participants (male: 84 and female: 69) completed at least one diary and were subsequently included in analysis of compliance rates. Results We observed a significant difference ( F 2,124 =6.341; P =.002) in compliance to filling out daily diaries, with the Game-Motivated ePRO group having the highest compliance (mean completion 86.4%, SD 19.6%), followed by the ePRO group (mean completion 77.7%, SD 24.1%), and finally, the Paper PRO group (mean completion 70.6%, SD 23.4%). The Game-Motivated ePRO ( P =.002) significantly improved compliance rates above the Paper PRO. In addition, the Game-Motivated ePRO resulted in higher compliance rates than the rates of ePRO alone ( P =.09). Equally important, even though we observed significant differences in completion of daily diaries between groups, we did not observe any statistically significant differences in association between the responses to a daily mood question and study group, the average diary completion time ( P= .52), or the System Usability Scale score ( P =.88). Conclusions The Game-Motivated ePRO system encouraged individuals to complete the daily diaries above the compliance rates of the Paper PRO and ePRO without altering the participants’ responses. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03738254; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03738254 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74T1p8u5...

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Use of In-Game Rewards to Motivate Daily Self-Report Compliance: Randomized Controlled Trial

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Dans le domaine de la vocalité, cette recherche sur les unités sonores de l'intonation expressive procède en allant du signifié vers le signifiant, selon la méthode empirique (cf. Kosecki, Badio, 2015) L'analyse des corpus -enregistrés ou non -applique les règles procédurales suivantes :…”

Section: L'approche Phonopragmatiqueunclassified

Comment dire sans dire?

Gamarra

2022

languesparole

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Lorsque, pour faire part de ses opinions, de ses goûts, de ses états d’âme, de ses aversions, l’énonciateur emploie un discours ou un méta-discours non-verbal, cela signifie qu’il le fait avec des intonations expressives. Celles-ci remplacent les mots correspondants. Elles sont d’une grande richesse et d’une grande variété. La composante vocale donne à l’énonciateur la capacité de faire avancer très rapidement le développement de son thème, et elle lui offre de nombreuses facilités pour des stratégies discursives, comme : gauchir le sens dénoté de ses mots, le renforcer, le contester, l’infirmer, en réduire la portée, ménager sa face et celle de l’allocutaire. Il transmet alors à la dérobée jugement, moquerie, insinuation, réserve, surprise, suggestion, espoir, réprobation, conseil, appréciation, remontrance, colère, conviction, demande de connivence, compassion... Avec des exemples (conversations non préparées, film) où l’acoustique est la seule marque qui guide le destinataire vers l’interprétation du non-dit de l’énonciateur, est analysé le signifié pragmatique et le signifiant des unités linguistiques de l’intonation expressive que sont les signes vocaux. Une comparaison est ensuite établie entre les façons dont deux méthodes de fle traitent l’acte de langage non verbal, et leurs rapports avec la réalité du phénomène. Puis sont exposés rapidement le cadre et les procédures de la recherche en phonopragmatique.

show abstract

Metonymic construal and vehicle selection

Kowalewski

2019

P&C

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article investigates the process of the selection of vehicle concepts in Polish Sign Language (PJM). Why are certain contiguity relations chosen out of many potentially available candidates as the basis for metonymies and why do some other contiguity relations not make felicitous metonymies? The process is certainly influenced by many factors, but the article focuses on several factors related to the dimensions of construal of metonymic concepts (in Langacker’s understanding), including the scope of conception and aspects of perspective (the preference for the observable entities and the distinction between subjectively and objectively construed concepts). Vehicle selection is also constrained by the effective reference requirement and the subjectively perceived vitality of contiguity relations.

show abstract

Cognitive Processes in Language

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Use of In-Game Rewards to Motivate Daily Self-Report Compliance: Randomized Controlled Trial

Use of In-Game Rewards to Motivate Daily Self-Report Compliance: Randomized Controlled Trial

Comment dire sans dire?

Metonymic construal and vehicle selection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About