2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.spen.2006.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Profile of Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
129
2
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
12
129
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…33, 34 The effect of age exceeds the effect of radiation dose. This provides guidance regarding selection of patients for treatment, and it additionally demonstrates the overarching influence of age and increasing deficits with time in younger patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33, 34 The effect of age exceeds the effect of radiation dose. This provides guidance regarding selection of patients for treatment, and it additionally demonstrates the overarching influence of age and increasing deficits with time in younger patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In keeping with previous findings [8,9], it was hypothesised that, overall, children with NF1 would demonstrate poorer social competence compared with their typically developing peers (Hypothesis 1). However, given the variability observed in the clinical phenotype of children with NF1 [43,45], significant variability in their social competence was also anticipated (Hypothesis 2).…”
Section: Aims Of the Current Studymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Investigations of the neuropsychological profiles of children with NF1 have consistently documented a general "downward shift" in overall IQ (Ferner et al 1996), with the mean intellectual functioning of children with NF1 in the low end of the average to low average range (Levine et al 2006;North 1998North , 2000. Beyond intellect, studies have found specific deficits in visual perception, most consistently on the Benton Judgment of Line Orientation (JLO) task (Rowbotham et al 2009;Hyman et al 2005;Schrimsher et al 2003;Benton et al 1983), along with more generalized difficulties in the areas of language development (Hyman et al 2005), executive functioning (Templer et al 2012;Roy et al 2010;North et al 2002), and attention (Templer et al 2012;North et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%