2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive profile of young well-trained athletes with intellectual disabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps a more applicable explanation could be that cognitive control and adequate focus of attention are important metacognitive skills to successful pacing (Brick et al, 2016). These metacognitive skills, and most specifically the proactive cognitive control (i.e., anticipatory, goal-oriented processing of information or planning) place a great demand on cognitive resources (Braver, 2012) and these higher order cognitive skills were previously demonstrated to be reduced in elite athletes with intellectual impairment (Van Biesen et al, 2016b), who already have, by the nature of their impairment, limited cognitive resources (Van Biesen et al, unpublished manuscript). People with intellectual impairment are also known to have deficits in a range of other complex higher-order skills that are relevant to pacing (e.g., problem-solving, logical reasoning, and language-dependent strategies such as self-talk; Aitchison et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perhaps a more applicable explanation could be that cognitive control and adequate focus of attention are important metacognitive skills to successful pacing (Brick et al, 2016). These metacognitive skills, and most specifically the proactive cognitive control (i.e., anticipatory, goal-oriented processing of information or planning) place a great demand on cognitive resources (Braver, 2012) and these higher order cognitive skills were previously demonstrated to be reduced in elite athletes with intellectual impairment (Van Biesen et al, 2016b), who already have, by the nature of their impairment, limited cognitive resources (Van Biesen et al, unpublished manuscript). People with intellectual impairment are also known to have deficits in a range of other complex higher-order skills that are relevant to pacing (e.g., problem-solving, logical reasoning, and language-dependent strategies such as self-talk; Aitchison et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their study, after doing a control test for age (5–14 years), pacing differences were distinguished between groups of school children in different stages of cognitive development. In another study it was demonstrated in a large sample of elite swimmers, athletes, basketball- and table tennis players with intellectual impairment that their cognitive abilities relevant to sport in general (e.g., visual processing, reaction and decision making speed, short-term memory and fluid reasoning) were significantly reduced compared to equally well-trained athletes without impairment (Van Biesen et al, 2016b), so it can be assumed that specific cognitive abilities relevant to pacing and performance in running (i.e., decision making, anticipation) will also be influenced by having an intellectual impairment. A first study exploring this analyzed the ability of runners with an intellectual impairment to maintain a pre-planned velocity over 400 m, an essential aspect of pacing (Van Biesen et al, 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare II and AB basketball player´s capacity to solve basketball game situations. A recent study revealed that well trained II-athletes performed significantly worse than AB-athletes in a generic cognitive test to assess executive functions and cognitive abilities relevant to sport (Van Biesen, Mactavish, McCulloch, Lenaerts & Vanlandewijck, 2016); based on this study, it can be hypothesized that II-basketball players decide significantly slower and less effectively in realistic basketball conditions than their ABpeers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…INAS recognizes the definition of II given by the World Health Organisation and American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (AAIDD), which stipulates three conditions that an athlete should demonstrate: Impairment of Intellectual functioning (IQ≤75), limitations in adapted behaviour, and the impairment must be evident during the developmental period (from conception to 18 years of age) (AAIDD, 2010). At the second step, sports intelligence of the athlete is evaluated, by performing the Generic Cognitive Test (Van Biesen, Mactavish, McCulloch, Lenaerts, & Vanlandewijck, 2016). Sports intelligence assessment focuses only on the cognitive abilities which are essential in sport, leaving apart other generic cognitive factors that are not relevant in sport situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the role of working memory in II poomsae performance remains unknown. Due to the fact that individuals with II often present reduced generic memory span (Lanfranchi, Cornoldi, & Vianello, 2004;Van Biesen, Mactavish, McCulloch et al, 2016), it is crucial to know its association with taekwondo poomsae specific memory. If that relationship exists (generic-sport specific memory), the influence of II on taekwondo poomsae performance will be better understood, being particularly evident during learning and memorizing processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%