2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive profiling of Parkinson disease patients with mild cognitive impairment and dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
94
4
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
9
94
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We found the highest RSD% expressed by MoCA in PDD (30 %). These results corroborate previous findings that MoCA is more sensitive than the MMSE in detecting early cognitive changes in PD (Biundo et al 2014; Chou et al 2014; Dalrymple-Alford et al 2011; Hoops et al 2009). Moreover, MoCA did not show a floor effect, suggesting that this scale, as well as the MMSE, may be a valid instrument to detect dementia in PD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We found the highest RSD% expressed by MoCA in PDD (30 %). These results corroborate previous findings that MoCA is more sensitive than the MMSE in detecting early cognitive changes in PD (Biundo et al 2014; Chou et al 2014; Dalrymple-Alford et al 2011; Hoops et al 2009). Moreover, MoCA did not show a floor effect, suggesting that this scale, as well as the MMSE, may be a valid instrument to detect dementia in PD.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Pearson’s correlation between the two scale scores at 1-year follow-up assessment was calculated. Two-way ANOVA with scale (MMSE or MOCA) and baseline cognitive severity subgroups [based on published MoCA cut-offs (Biundo et al 2014)] as predictors and rate of cognitive decline as dependent factor was carried out. Paired t test and Wilcoxon non parametric test (if normality was not assumed) were used to compare mean annual rate of change between the scales for each cognitive severity subgroup.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 This is consistent with the findings of a data reduction study 24 that found cognitive testing of PDD resulted in a complex profile of domains affected and other studies that find complex profiles of poor performance in PD-MCI 2527 By result the cumulative effect of domain-by-domain cognitive declines becomes a marker of the time in PDD-specific cognitive decline. Moreover these declines are accumulating quickly (within 1–2 years) and early changes in CDR staging (see Sum of Boxes in Table 2) need to trigger for more intensive testing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…What extent of functional impairment is needed to distinguish PD-MCI from PDD? Since criteria for PD-MCI were published a discussion has developed regarding subtest sensitivities, 24,2526 cutpoints that should be applied, 25,2726 and whether or not there exists a single domain PD-MCI. 24 The burgeoning literature suggests that extensive psychometric work will need to be conducted by many centers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding further suggests a distinctive relation between object-related information and executive processes. Suggestively, studies with PD-MCI groups revealing naming and fluency deficits on nouns documented concomitant executive dysfunctions (Biundo et al, 2014;Caviness et al, 2007;Pfeiffer, Løkkegaard, Zoetmulder, Friberg, & Werdelin, 2014). Taken together, these data indicate that aspects of the BG may be involved in the networks supporting object-relevant knowledge (at the lexical and semantic levels) and their association with EFs, although further research is required in this regard.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 73%