2015
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2015.2472008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Radio Networks With Probabilistic Relaying: Stable Throughput and Delay Tradeoffs

Abstract: This paper studies fundamental throughput and delay tradeoffs in cognitive radio systems with cooperative secondary users. We focus on randomized cooperative policies, whereby the secondary user (SU) serves either its own queue or the primary users (PU) relayed packets queue with certain service probability. The proposed policy opens room for trading the PU delay for enhanced SU delay, and vice versa, depending on the application QoS requirements. Towards this objective, the systems stable throughput region is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. We compare the proposed policy to a baseline cooperation policy (BL), coined "unconstrained partial cooperation policy" [9]. In BL, the SU probabilistically cooperates with the PU in delivering its packets in Q sp with no constraint on the delay encountered by the PU packets.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. We compare the proposed policy to a baseline cooperation policy (BL), coined "unconstrained partial cooperation policy" [9]. In BL, the SU probabilistically cooperates with the PU in delivering its packets in Q sp with no constraint on the delay encountered by the PU packets.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to [7], [9], [10], the SU is assumed to perfectly know the state of the PU of whether it is backlogged or idle and, hence, there is no interference in our system. A possible approach to accomplish this objective is via sensing the communication channel by the SU in order to detect the time slots at which the PU is idle.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to above work, our results in this paper are also related to those on resource allocation and opportunistic scheduling for underlay cognitive radio networks (CRNs) [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. The authors in [25] investigated the optimal power control and the resulting throughput scaling laws for underlay CRNs under average interference power constraints at the primary users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…9, we compare average delay performance of ARC with cooperative relaying (CR) protocol in [18] under perfect sensing case for L = 1. Average PU packet delay in CR has been derived in [18,Eq. (14), (16), (17)].…”
Section: Average Pu Packet Delay: Comparison With [18]mentioning
confidence: 99%