2015
DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2014.995230
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive rehabilitation with right hemifield eye-patching for patients with sub-acute stroke and visuo-spatial neglect: A randomized controlled trial

Abstract: The results obtained do not allow one to conclude that the combination treatment with cognitive rehabilitation and right hemifield eye-patching is more effective than cognitive rehabilitation alone. Although partial improvement in the performance of neuropsychological tests was observed, this improvement is not present at functional level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This training led to improvements in the Line bisection task (Schenkenberg et al, 1980) ( p = .039), and combined with right hemifield eye-patching resulted in improvements both in the Line bisection task and in the Bells test (all p = .043). In the pre- and post-intervention comparison between stroke groups, patients who received the combined treatment had better performance in the Reading Task ( p = .048), than patients only received cognitive training (Aparicio-Lopez et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This training led to improvements in the Line bisection task (Schenkenberg et al, 1980) ( p = .039), and combined with right hemifield eye-patching resulted in improvements both in the Line bisection task and in the Bells test (all p = .043). In the pre- and post-intervention comparison between stroke groups, patients who received the combined treatment had better performance in the Reading Task ( p = .048), than patients only received cognitive training (Aparicio-Lopez et al, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the outcomes of the intervention programs (RQ5), Class I studies showed evidence of immediate improvement of vision (hemianopia) with compensation method (Mödden et al, 2012), hemineglect using vestibular intervention – Cawthorne-Cooksey exercises (Dai et al, 2013), cognitive functioning using proprioceptive stimulation – muscle vibration (Müller et al, 2002), sustained attention using olfactory stimulation (Sullivan et al, 1998) and an adapted version of Attention Process Training Program (Dundon et al, 2015). Immediate and long-term improvements were found on somatosensory discrimination using this intervention (Carey et al, 2011) and hemineglect using Guttman-NeuroPersonalTrainer with and without eye-patching (Aparicio-Lopez et al, 2015). Only one study of Class III used a stimulus-generalization training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Top-down approaches, aimed at teaching patients strategies to compensate for their neglect deficits voluntarily, require full cooperation from the patient to be aware of the neglected space, such as visual scanning and mental imagery ( 7 , 8 ). Bottom-up approaches, designed to adapt the external environment or apply sensory stimulation, focus on remediating patients' perception of neglected space, such as prism adaptation ( 9 ), limb activation therapy ( 10 ), optokinetic stimulation ( 11 , 12 ), feedback training ( 13 ), neck muscle vibration ( 14 ), trunk rotation ( 15 ), and eye patching ( 16 ). However, there is only limited evidence and effects of these methods on neglect symptoms and functional performance with current methods ( 17 , 18 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%