2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3325048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Relationship-Based Approach for Urdu Sarcasm and Sentiment Classification

Muhammad Yaseen Khan,
Tafseer Ahmed,
Muhammad Shoaib Siddiqui
et al.

Abstract: Humans have a natural tendency to express their emotions, but they are also skilled at using sarcasm to shape their feelings. In cognitive computing and natural language processing research, sentiment analysis and sarcasm detection are typically treated as separate tasks, with each text analyzed in isolation. However, this approach overlooks the connection between sentiment and sarcasm. We believe that sentiment and sarcasm are closely related and should be analyzed together to achieve a better understanding o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
(99 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the experiments indicate that the DL-based model outperforms generic machine learning approaches, as evidenced by its F1 score of 85% on the UNED sentence-based corpus and 50% on the UNED paragraph-based corpus. Khan et al 44 this research paper introduces a novel framework that capitalizes on the Cognitive Relationship (CR) between sarcasm and sentiment in order to enhance classification precision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of the experiments indicate that the DL-based model outperforms generic machine learning approaches, as evidenced by its F1 score of 85% on the UNED sentence-based corpus and 50% on the UNED paragraph-based corpus. Khan et al 44 this research paper introduces a novel framework that capitalizes on the Cognitive Relationship (CR) between sarcasm and sentiment in order to enhance classification precision.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%