Cognitive Remediation Therapy for People With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: A Rapid Qualitative Review

Abstract


 This rapid qualitative review analyzed 8 studies describing the perspectives of people living with schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) who use cognitive remediation therapy (CRT), and their caregivers and clinicians.
 People living with SSD reported notable improvements in their attention, memory, and problem solving; improvement in their lives when they applied the cognitive strategies acquired from CRT into daily life activities; improvement in communication skills, social engagement, motivation, independence; and a reduction in psychotic symptoms.
 This review found a common preference among people living with SSD and caregivers to provide personalized delivery and treatment of CRT.
 People living with SSD cited several ways to introduce personalized CRT: cognitive trainer or clinician’s support and guidance; the content, design, and implementation of CRT; using technology; and group environment and interacting with peers. The constant presence of a polite, friendly, empathetic, and encouraging clinician contributed to beneficial views of CRT.
 People living with SSD enjoyed the structure of sessions and cognitive tasks, specifically working on tasks at their own pace with gradual increases in difficulty that gave them a sense of accomplishment and mastery. They also enjoyed using technology and playing games to complete tasks; however, some found accessing a computer and a high-quality internet connection difficult.
 While people living with SSD reported several social benefits to group-based CRT, others found group-based CRT to be unconducive for their learning, especially when the group environment was not supportive or encouraging.
 Caregivers and clinicians recognized the importance of matching the type of cognitive exercises and structure of sessions to the cognitive needs of people living with SSD.

Effectiveness of offloading interventions for people with diabetes‐related foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…Over the last decade there have been over 20 systematic reviews on different offloading interventions in people with DFU 27,30–33,52,56,173–185 . Therefore, we limit our comparisons of findings in our new review to those of our previous review of all offloading interventions, 33 and all other reviews performing meta‐analyses on different offloading interventions 27,29–32,52,174,183,184 …”

“…Over the last decade there have been over 20 systematic reviews on different offloading interventions in people with DFU. 27,[30][31][32][33]52,56,[173][174][175][176][177][178][179][180][181][182][183][184][185] Therefore, we limit our comparisons of findings in our new review to those of our previous review of all offloading interventions, 33 and all other reviews performing meta-analyses on different offloading interventions. 27,[29][30][31][32]52,174,183,184 Compared to our previous review, 33 our new review has made many methodological improvements.…”

Perspective Chapter: Clinical Features and Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

“…Mechanical offloading proves helpful for ulcers that undergo prolonged or frequent pressure and stress or recurrent mild pressure. To reduce the incidence of foot ulcers and infection, they disperse pressure on plantar surfaces, decreasing pressure on the ulcers [71]. For healing to be maintained, the offloading system must reach a threshold peak pressure of 200 KPa.…”

“…Total contact casting is considered the gold standard treatment for offloading DFU [71]. A total contact cast is a non-removable semi-rigid molded cast wrapped around and in contact with the foot and a portion of the leg using the TCC technique.…”