Cognitive screening instruments to identify vascular cognitive impairment: A systematic review

Abstract

Introduction Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is common and important to detect as controlling risk factors, particularly hypertension, may slow onset and progression. There is no consensus as to which cognitive screening instrument (CSI) is most suitable for VCI. We systematically reviewed the psychometric properties of brief CSIs for vascular mild cognitive impairment (VMCI) and vascular dementia (VaD). Methods Literature searches were performed using scholarly databases from inception until 31 May 2018. Studies were eligible if participants were aged 18 or older, interviewed face‐to‐face, and standard diagnostic criteria for VCI were applied, excluding those specifically identifying post‐stroke dementia. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Results Fifteen studies were identified including eight types of CSIs (27 subtests/variants) and 4575 participants (1015 with VCI), mean age range: 51.6 to 75.5 years. Most studies compared more than one instrument. Five papers examined clock‐drawing; four, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE); and three used the Brief Memory and Executive Test (BMET). The MoCA (AUC > 0.90) and MMSE (AUC: 0.86‐0.99) had excellent accuracy in differentiating VaD from controls; the MoCA had good internal consistency (Cronbach's α: .83‐.88). The MoCA (AUC: 0.87‐0.93) and BMET (AUC: 0.94) had the greatest accuracy in separating VMCI from controls. Most studies had low to moderate risk of bias in all domains of the QUIPS. Data were heterogeneous, precluding a meta‐analysis. Conclusions Although few studies were available and further research is required, data suggests that the MoCA is accurate and reliable for differentiating VaD and VMCI from controls.

Cognitive and balance impairments in people with incidental white matter hyperintensities

“…4). This result is parallel with that of Abd Ghafar and colleagues, 2019 [21] who declared that global cognitive assessment scales including MoCA could be a sensitive screening test for patients with vascular cognitive impairment yet this sensitivity is much lowered in preclinical cases with subjective cognitive decline including occult WMHs subjects.…”

Altered Dynamic Neural Activity in the Default Mode Network in Lung Cancer Patients After Chemotherapy

“…In directly comparison of intrinsic brain activity parameters between before and after CTx, we observed changes in 4 parameters: decreased ALFF in the precuneus, [28]. MoCA has excellent accuracy and good internal consistency [29]. Besides, it is more likely to be tolerable for lung cancer patients undergoing CTx, because it is simple and does not take long to perform.…”

Association between Ankle Brachial Index, Brachial-Ankle Pulse Wave Velocity, and Mild Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Acute Lacunar Infarction

“…Patients with ALI were divided into MCI and non-MCI groups according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores. The MoCA, including tests of visuospatial/executive function, naming, attention, language ability, abstraction, delayed memory, and seven aspects of orientation, has excellent accuracy in differentiating MCI patients from patients with normal cognitive function [17]. Patients with MoCA scores ≤23 were considered to have cognitive dysfunction [18].…”