2014
DOI: 10.1177/1541931214581045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive State Assessment

Abstract: This effort investigated the ability of a neurophysiological measure to detect changes in workload during a task which is sensitive to cognitive function. A growing collection of research suggests that physiological measures such as EEG can be used to inform the adaptation of systems. However, it has been proposed that such measures often provide a gross interpretation of cognitive workload during complex tasks and are not sensitive to differences in specific cognitive function. To understand the utility of ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Berka et al’s (2007) study, ABM’s algorithms have been validated with other cognitive tests (Stroop; Sciarini, Grubb, & Fatolitis, 2014), physical and social states (sleep deprivation, Westbrook et al, 2004; team collaboration, Stevens, Galloway, & Berka, 2006), and populations (athletes, Stikic et al, 2014). It thus becomes possible to use metrics of cognitive state to assess the theory of cognitive resource allocation in YOAs versus VOAs within the context of the positivity effect with emotionally valenced stimuli.…”
Section: Positivity Effect and Working Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Berka et al’s (2007) study, ABM’s algorithms have been validated with other cognitive tests (Stroop; Sciarini, Grubb, & Fatolitis, 2014), physical and social states (sleep deprivation, Westbrook et al, 2004; team collaboration, Stevens, Galloway, & Berka, 2006), and populations (athletes, Stikic et al, 2014). It thus becomes possible to use metrics of cognitive state to assess the theory of cognitive resource allocation in YOAs versus VOAs within the context of the positivity effect with emotionally valenced stimuli.…”
Section: Positivity Effect and Working Memorymentioning
confidence: 99%