2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15327051hci1903_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitive Strategies for the Visual Search of Hierarchical Computer Displays

Abstract: This article investigates the cognitive strategies that people use to search computer displays. Several different visual layouts are examined: unlabeled layouts that contain multiple groups of items but no group headings, labeled layouts in which items are grouped and each group has a useful heading, and a target-only layout that contains just one item. A number of plausible strategies were proposed for each layout. Each strategy was programmed into the EPIC cognitive architecture, producing models that simula… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many cognitive models of visual search that may one day converge to form a solid basis for the theory of visual search in HCI [1,4,12]. While these models are very useful, many such models are designed to explain the effects of particular visual structures or salient features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many cognitive models of visual search that may one day converge to form a solid basis for the theory of visual search in HCI [1,4,12]. While these models are very useful, many such models are designed to explain the effects of particular visual structures or salient features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixations as revealed by eye tracking studies could be determined by image salience and goal-directed attention [10,11]; however, objects that are actively processed by users may not be the same as those that are fixated. Therefore we investigate the link between fixations, users' perceived attention to objects of interest, their overall preference and memory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the case of the clustered and linear with categories interfaces, participants relied on the labels which accompanied each cluster or category of metadata elements in order to decide whether a group included useful information for relevance judgment. This finding aligns with the systematic visual search process according to which the user first inspects the labels of each group and then selects the target label in order to view its contents (Hornof, 2004).…”
Section: Structure Of Metadata Elementsmentioning
confidence: 92%