2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-60066-6_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cognitivism and Nominalism in the Philosophy of Linguistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…51 Historically, this development could be understood as a reaction to the rise of cognitivism as the main explanatory model for mental processes; for example (and most prominently in the work of Noam Chomsky), in linguistics. 52 Although the debate on the relative merits and demerits of both approaches has engulfed philosophy (particularly phenomenology), cognitive science and psychology for many years, we also find promising attempts to identify cross-fertilizing aspects, rather than further deepening and entrenching the scholarly divide. 53 In the realm of VR studies, however, it seems safe to say that concepts pertaining to the 4E framework for studying the effects of VR on user experience and behavior are far more widely used than cognitivist models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…51 Historically, this development could be understood as a reaction to the rise of cognitivism as the main explanatory model for mental processes; for example (and most prominently in the work of Noam Chomsky), in linguistics. 52 Although the debate on the relative merits and demerits of both approaches has engulfed philosophy (particularly phenomenology), cognitive science and psychology for many years, we also find promising attempts to identify cross-fertilizing aspects, rather than further deepening and entrenching the scholarly divide. 53 In the realm of VR studies, however, it seems safe to say that concepts pertaining to the 4E framework for studying the effects of VR on user experience and behavior are far more widely used than cognitivist models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%