2016
DOI: 10.2147/copd.s116422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherence between self-reported and objectively measured physical activity in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease: a systematic review

Abstract: The beneficial effects of physical activity (PA) in patients with COPD, as well as the methods of their assessment, are well known and described. As objective measures of PA, such as the use of motion sensors, video recordings, exercise capacity testing, and indirect calorimetry, are not easily obtained in the daily clinical life, the reliability of the more accessible self-reported measurements of PA is important. In this review, we systematically identified original studies involving COPD patients and at lea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is known that self-reported outcomes show discrepancies to objective measured outcomes,38 and therefore we assessed physical activity using an established activity monitor 19,39. Indeed, when analyzing the data retrieved from these monitors we found a relationship between objectively measured physical activity and an increase in morning symptom severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, it is known that self-reported outcomes show discrepancies to objective measured outcomes,38 and therefore we assessed physical activity using an established activity monitor 19,39. Indeed, when analyzing the data retrieved from these monitors we found a relationship between objectively measured physical activity and an increase in morning symptom severity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This percentage might be considered low compared with previous studies quantifying daily walking time in COPD3 but may be due to differences in the characteristics of the COPD patient samples studied, differences in localization and climate that have been reported to affect physical activity,26 and the instrument used to capture walking time (eg, self-reported methods have the potential to overestimate the amount of physical activity performed),8,27 among others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In contrast, accelerometers, that can measure acceleration counts in real‐time and detect movements in three orthogonal planes, were always positively correlated with the beneficial forms of motivation and the motivation indexes. While subjective methods to measure PA are used in many of our selected studies, and despite the fact that the relation between motivation parameters and PA are mostly positive with these measurement tools (ie, questionnaires and self‐reports), these results must be handled with caution as PA could be overestimated …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While subjective methods to measure PA are used in many of our selected studies, and despite the fact that the relation between motivation parameters and PA are mostly positive with these measurement tools (ie, questionnaires and self-reports), these results must be handled with caution as PA could be overestimated. 74 Nevertheless, the whole physical education learning process is very complex. Physical activity represents only one part, and as said by Hollis et al 7 "meeting the 50% MVPA target is only one aspect of measuring the quality of PE lessons."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%