2004
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.20156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherence‐induced artifacts in large‐flip‐angle steady‐state spin‐echo imaging

Abstract: High-resolution imaging of trabecular bone aimed at analyzing the bone's microarchitecture is preferably performed with spinecho-type pulse sequences. Unlike gradient echoes, spin-echoes are immune to artifactual broadening of trabeculae caused by local static field gradients near the bone-bone marrow interface and signal loss from chemical shift dephasing at kspace center. However, the previously practiced 3D fast largeangle spin-echo (FLASE) pulse sequence was found to be prone to a low-frequency modulation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through-slice signal fluctuation attributed to a specific stimulated echo was minimized by changing the sign of the crusher moment relative to that of the slice-encoding gradient. We found that the subject’s ankle size and position within the coil can lead to inter-scan variations in B1 inhomogeneity (the major source of stimulated echo artifacts due to deviations of the phase-reversal pulse from 180°) (13). The presence of such artifacts can thus impair reproducibility of quantitative measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Through-slice signal fluctuation attributed to a specific stimulated echo was minimized by changing the sign of the crusher moment relative to that of the slice-encoding gradient. We found that the subject’s ankle size and position within the coil can lead to inter-scan variations in B1 inhomogeneity (the major source of stimulated echo artifacts due to deviations of the phase-reversal pulse from 180°) (13). The presence of such artifacts can thus impair reproducibility of quantitative measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In MRI, detection of changes in these parameters is mired by image artifacts, involuntary subject motion, and volume misalignment between time-points which limit the achievable reproducibility. Image artifacts associated with TB imaging include susceptibility-induced thickening (12), stimulated echo artifacts (13), and aliasing (14). Advances in acquisition and image processing have led to the development of the “virtual bone biopsy”, a μMRI based suite of tools that provides detailed quantitative information on TB architecture at surrogate skeletal sites (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The imperfect 1808 pulse converts a fraction of the phase-encoded transverse magnetization to longitudinal magnetization that recurs as transverse magnetization in the subsequent pulse sequence cycle, forming a spurious stimulated echo (89). A modification in the location of the encoding gradients remedies the problem.…”
Section: Image Acquisition Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice the banding artifact (vertical streaking) in Fig. 6c, caused by stimulated echoes (14) resulting from imperfections in the nonselective phase‐reversal pulses. As mentioned above, the longer repetition time of FLADE diminishes this kind of artifact.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the large flip angle (>90°) of the selective excitation pulse can be problematic in terms of the uniformity of the slice profile. Second, the short repetition time (much shorter than T 1 of the protons in fatty marrow) can cause stimulated echoes that are difficult to eliminate using crusher gradients (14). Third, the low receiver bandwidth required for good SNR performance causes broadening of the point spread function in the readout direction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%