2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6638(08)00003-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent Backscattering and Anderson Localization of Light

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
2
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of techniques exist which provide a single measurement of the scattering properties of a given sample volume. Diffusing Wave Spectroscopy (DWS) [9] (or "Diffuse Transmission Spectroscopy" [10]) and coherent backscattering [11] are such techniques that can measure the scattering strength of a diffusive medium through determination of a characteristic parameter known as the transport mean free path l * or the reduced scattering coefficient μ t = 1/l * . Light reflected from a turbid medium has typically entered the object up to a depth z of a (few times the) transport mean free path l * .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of techniques exist which provide a single measurement of the scattering properties of a given sample volume. Diffusing Wave Spectroscopy (DWS) [9] (or "Diffuse Transmission Spectroscopy" [10]) and coherent backscattering [11] are such techniques that can measure the scattering strength of a diffusive medium through determination of a characteristic parameter known as the transport mean free path l * or the reduced scattering coefficient μ t = 1/l * . Light reflected from a turbid medium has typically entered the object up to a depth z of a (few times the) transport mean free path l * .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to several factors such as a non-ideal point source, a finite sample cell size (which eliminates the possibility of long scattering paths), and the presence of closed loop scattering paths. 20,21 The resolution and quality of the image depends on several factors, such as the volume fraction of the scatterer ϕ, the diameter of the scatterer D, and the distance d. When the scatterer diameter D is fixed, low volume fraction ϕ (corresponding to a low number content) reduces the possibility of multiple scattering paths, and therefore resulting in a small enhancement factor. On the other hand, when the volume fraction is too large (corresponding to a large number content), the recurrent scattering leads to a reduction of the enhancement factor and an increase in the full width at halfmaximum (FWHM) of the PSF, 22 which lead to a decreasing image resolution.…”
Section: B Characterization and Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is long known that they are destructive for magnetic or spinorbit scattering since a rotation of 2π of the electron spins gives rise to a sign flip of the interference terms. In this case, one rather gets weak anti-localization effects as revealed by magneto-resistance measurements and suppression of the coherent backscattering (CBS) effect [23,26]. The very same situation happens in graphene [27][28][29][30] where the band structure induces two Berry monopoles of opposite charge located at the Dirac points, hence an effective magnetic field in momentum space.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%