2014
DOI: 10.1364/ao.53.004881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent beam combining using a 2D internally sensed optical phased array

Abstract: Coherent combination of multiple lasers using an optical phased array (OPA) is an effective way to scale optical intensity in the far field beyond the capabilities of single fiber lasers. Using an actively phase locked, internally sensed, 2D OPA we demonstrate over 95% fringe visibility of the interfered beam, λ/120 RMS output phase stability over a 5 Hz bandwidth, and quadratic scaling of intensity in the far field using three emitters. This paper presents a new internally sensed OPA architecture that employs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These so-called internally sensed OPAs have the advantage of not requiring external sensing optics, allowing them to be constructed entirely within optical fiber. [4][5][6] One disadvantage of internal sensing is, however, the introduction of what is called a π-phase ambiguity caused by light double-passing the same length of optical fiber. If the relative phase of two emitters at the output of the array is π radians, then upon passing through the same length of optical fiber twice it will appear to be 2π.…”
Section: External Vs Internal Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These so-called internally sensed OPAs have the advantage of not requiring external sensing optics, allowing them to be constructed entirely within optical fiber. [4][5][6] One disadvantage of internal sensing is, however, the introduction of what is called a π-phase ambiguity caused by light double-passing the same length of optical fiber. If the relative phase of two emitters at the output of the array is π radians, then upon passing through the same length of optical fiber twice it will appear to be 2π.…”
Section: External Vs Internal Sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of our demonstration system described in this proceeding is to demonstrate observable beam steering using an externally sensed OPA. Previous work at The Australian National University (ANU) by Roberts et al [4][5][6] used a 3-emitter OPA to demonstrate high power handling, internally sensed architecture, and digital phasemeters. By changing the system architecture to a more simple externally sensed arrangement, which is easier to scale up, we implemented a 7-emitter OPA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By controlling the phase of each emitter in the array, it is possible to steer the beam in the far-field. 1 In this talk we present the design of a scalable digitally controlled OPA. We describe the experimental demonstration of the phase sensing and control system, and progress towards fast (MHz) steering speeds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost all existing CBC techniques measure the output phase of the array by sampling the outgoing beam externally using free space optics (e.g., [5][6][7][8]). In contrast to external sensing, Bowman et al [9] and Roberts et al [10] presented a technique that does not require free-space optics to measure the output phase of the beam, instead relying on the small fraction of light that is reflected back into the fiber at the OPA's glass-air interface to infer the relative phase of each emitter. This internal sensing technique infers the differential phase between uncommon paths by measuring the phase of the back-reflected light that double-passes each fiber.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst the OPA design in [10] successfully validated the internal sensing concept, it also highlighted the architecture's incompatibility with in-line fiber amplifiers which do not tolerate back-reflected light. The total combined power of Roberts' OPA was limited to that of the master laser, and unable to support optical powers exceeding the damage threshold of sensitive optical devices (e.g., EOMs, which have a damage threshold on the order of ∼100 mW) in each path.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%