2017
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/117/57006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent control and charge echo in a GaAs charge qubit

Abstract: In fulfilling the non-adiabatic requirement of pulse sequences, it is challenging to perform multi-pulse quantum control of a charge qubit. By optimizing our charge qubit and pulse parameters, we experimentally demonstrate the coherent control and echo process of a GaAs charge qubit. We firstly employed a single non-adiabatic voltage pulse to perform the Larmor oscillation experiment and determine the optimal operation pulses. Then, we produced Ramsey fringes using two pulses and extracted the decoherence ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The gate operations can be performed when ∆ξ is tuned to 0 meV and 0.504 meV respectively while maintaining ξ 1 + ξ 2 = 3.5 meV. Our simulation results are consistent with the typical oscillation frequency observed in charge qubit schemes where Rabi oscillation frequency ranges from ∼ 1 GHz to ∼ 5 GHz [12,13,37,66,67]. In addition, our proposed qubit scheme allows additional controllability of the oscillation frequency which is absent in the conventional charge qubit.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The gate operations can be performed when ∆ξ is tuned to 0 meV and 0.504 meV respectively while maintaining ξ 1 + ξ 2 = 3.5 meV. Our simulation results are consistent with the typical oscillation frequency observed in charge qubit schemes where Rabi oscillation frequency ranges from ∼ 1 GHz to ∼ 5 GHz [12,13,37,66,67]. In addition, our proposed qubit scheme allows additional controllability of the oscillation frequency which is absent in the conventional charge qubit.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Perhaps the most intuitive realization is the double-quantum-dot charge qubit, for which an electron is allowed to occupy either one dot or the other, serving as the two logical states. Universal single-qubit operation can be performed by alternating between zero and large detuning ("tilt control") [1,[7][8][9][10][11][12], which achieves x and z-axis rotations, respectively. While this charge qubit has been demonstrated early-on to have very fast gate operations [1,13], it at the same time strongly suffers from charge noises [12,14,15], which has limited its development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a more conventional approach, in which DQD charge qubits are manipulated using non-adiabatic pulses and read out by capacitively coupled charge detectors, T 2 coherence times of up to (7 ± 2.5) ns in GaAs [8] and (2.1 ± 0.4) ns in Si [16] have been observed. Spin Echo experiments performed with non-adiabatic pulses [17] found echo times of T 2,echo ∼ (1.4 ± 0.4) ns in GaAs [18] and Si [16]. Recently, first microwave driven coherent operations showed improved qubit control and a T 2,echo ∼ (2.2 ± 0.1) ns in three electron DQDs in SiGe [19], which is operated as hybrid spin and charge qubit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universal singlequbit operations of the charge qubit can be achieved by alternating the relative energy between the two dots [2,3], and two-qubit gates can be performed using the electrostatic coupling between them [4][5][6]. While this charge qubit can have very fast gate operations, it at the same time suffers heavily from charge noises, leading to very short coherence times [7][8][9][10][11][12]. Various proposals have been put forward to improve the control of charge qubits for quantum information processing, including ultrafast gates [13], ac control around certain sweet spots [14], or hybrid qubits that combine advantages of manipulating charge and spin states [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%