2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.041124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent coupling of individual quantum dots measured with phase-referenced two-dimensional spectroscopy: Photon echo versus double quantum coherence

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because interfacial and self‐assembled quantum dot ensembles grow randomly, this coupling gets washed out in ensemble measurements even as the homogeneous linewidth is preserved. Coupling has been observed and characterized, however, using frequency‐based MDCS in which excitation beams are arranged to impinge upon the sample in collinear geometry …”
Section: Quantum Dotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because interfacial and self‐assembled quantum dot ensembles grow randomly, this coupling gets washed out in ensemble measurements even as the homogeneous linewidth is preserved. Coupling has been observed and characterized, however, using frequency‐based MDCS in which excitation beams are arranged to impinge upon the sample in collinear geometry …”
Section: Quantum Dotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used the hyperspectral imaging technique to identify biexcitons and inter‐dot coupling effects using an MDCS rephasing pulse sequence, and Delmonte et al. have followed up on this experiment with a study comparing rephasing and two‐quantum MDCS pulse sequences . An example of the kinds of observable coupling signatures is displayed in Figure .…”
Section: Quantum Dotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been used to detect coherent coupling [83], the quantum strong coupling between a single emitter and a cavity [84], and cavity induced coherent coupling between single emitters [85]. More recently, improved phase referencing was used [86] to identify coherent coupling between single emitters via different coherent pathways.…”
Section: Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These weak off-diagonal signals most likely result from radiative in-teraction between adjacent quantum dot states, which has been shown to have a long range exceeding 400 nm [2]. Though weak, we measure interactions between few resonantly excited QDs over the sample, and weak interactions between resolved QD states have very recently been measured in self-assembled QDs [27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…With resonant excitation of only the QD states, these signals can result from three interactions. A double-quantum signal resulting from 1) biexcitons in non-interacting self-assembled QDs has been measured [27], but excitation of these signals requires enough bandwidth to excite both the exciton and biexciton. Our sample has been well characterized using MDCS, and it is known that the biexciton binding energy of an ensemble of these dots increases with emission energy from 3.3 to 3.8 meV, and it has a distribution about that center , which corresponds to a many-body interaction that has been turned on between those resonances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%