2020
DOI: 10.5194/se-11-1891-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent diffraction imaging for enhanced fault and fracture network characterization

Abstract: Abstract. Faults and fractures represent unique features of the solid Earth and are especially pervasive in the shallow crust. Aside from directly relating to crustal dynamics and the systematic assessment of associated risk, fault and fracture networks enable the efficient migration of fluids and therefore have a direct impact on concrete topics relevant to society, including climate-change-mitigating measures like CO2 sequestration or geothermal exploration and production. Due to their small-scale complexity… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keeping the non-specular component in the analysis allows retrieving signatures of localized scatterers such as cracks or inclusions that lack lateral continuity. Imaging such features whose size is of the order and even smaller than the seismic wavelength contributes significantly to seismic interpretation [55]. Fault surfaces and zones with increased fractures density are non-specular objects for surface sensors [56].…”
Section: D Scattering Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Keeping the non-specular component in the analysis allows retrieving signatures of localized scatterers such as cracks or inclusions that lack lateral continuity. Imaging such features whose size is of the order and even smaller than the seismic wavelength contributes significantly to seismic interpretation [55]. Fault surfaces and zones with increased fractures density are non-specular objects for surface sensors [56].…”
Section: D Scattering Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional seismic reflection methods can also be used for object detection by imaging PD hyperbolas in 2D and 3D seismic data sets (Bull et al., 2005; Carbon Trust, 2020; Gutowski et al., 2008; Vardy et al., 2008). As diffractions are up to two orders of magnitude weaker than reflections (Khaidukov et al., 2004), and thus difficult to detect within high‐amplitude reflection energy, a number of dedicated diffraction imaging techniques utilize reflection‐suppression methods such as Radon transforms (Bansal & Imhof, 2016), eigenvector filters (Bansal & Imhof, 2016; Guigné et al., 2014), plane‐wave deconstruction filters (Fomel et al., 2007; Ford et al., 2021), or adaptive subtraction (Khaidukov et al., 2004; Preine et al., 2020; Schwarz, 2019; Schwarz & Gajewski, 2017; Schwarz & Krawczyk, 2020). After suppression, the diffractions can be imaged via migration (Bachrach & Reshef, 2016; Ford et al., 2021; Preine et al., 2020), Radon transforms (Karimpouli et al., 2015; Nowak & Imhof, 2004), or beamforming (Guigné et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seismic diffraction imaging has been used to characterize a range of complex geological targets including faults, channels, pinchouts, rugose interfaces, karstic carbonate reservoirs, and fracture zones (Decker et al., 2015; Fomel et al., 2007; Reshef & Landa, 2009; Schwarz & Krawczyk, 2020). In this paper, we explore the potential of diffraction imaging to characterize the complex internal structure and external morphology of MTCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) (b) et al, 2015;Fomel et al, 2007;Reshef & Landa, 2009;Schwarz & Krawczyk, 2020). In this paper, we explore the potential of diffraction imaging to characterize the complex internal structure and external morphology of MTCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%