2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.98.015208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent μe conversion at next-to-leading order

Abstract: We analyze next-to-leading order (NLO) corrections and uncertainties for coherent µ − e conversion . The analysis is general but numerical results focus on 27 Al, which will be used in the Mu2E experiment. We obtain a simple expression for the branching ratio in terms of Wilson coefficients associated with possible physics beyond the Standard Model and a set of model-independent parameters determined solely by Standard Model dynamics. For scalar-mediated conversion, we find that NLO two-nucleon contributions c… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(160 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will check some concrete realizations when we investigate UV complete models. See [193] for a recent discussion at next-leading order.…”
Section: µ − E Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will check some concrete realizations when we investigate UV complete models. See [193] for a recent discussion at next-leading order.…”
Section: µ − E Conversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the leading chiral order, two-nucleon contributions to the µ → e conversion in a nucleus arise. Existing estimates show that effect is non-negligible for scalar interactions in 27 Al [132]. LQCD can provide useful input in this regard, by computing directly the appropriate MEs in light nuclei [79].…”
Section: -Year Goals and Plansmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…χPT [26] involving nucleons (see e.g. the review [19]) would be the appropriate formalism for this calculation, and has been used to calculate WIMP scattering on nuclei [20,21,22,23], neutrinolessdouble-beta-decay [24], and SI µ → e conversion [25]. However, to avoid more notation, here we just give results for the simple diagrams of interest.…”
Section: Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This estimate uses r 3 dr/3 ≃ r 2 dr, and applies in the absence of other contributions; the dipole coefficient sums with the scalar and vector coefficients in the amplitude, as given in eqn (25).…”
Section: The Dipolementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation