Coherent noise suppression by learning and analyzing the morphology of the data

Abstract

We have developed a method for suppressing coherent noise from seismic data by using the morphological differences between the noise and the signal. This method consists of three steps: First, we applied a dictionary learning method on the data to extract a redundant dictionary in which the morphological diversity of the data is stored. Such a dictionary is a set of unit vectors called atoms that represent elementary patterns that are redundant in the data. Because the dictionary is learned on data contaminated by coherent noise, it is a mix of atoms representing signal patterns and atoms representing noise patterns. In the second step, we separate the noise atoms from the signal atoms using a statistical classification. Hence, the learned dictionary is divided into two subdictionaries: one describing the morphology of the noise and the other one describing the morphology of the signal. Finally, we separate the seismic signal and the coherent noise via morphological component analysis (MCA); it uses sparsity with respect to the two subdictionaries to identify the signal and the noise contributions in the mixture. Hence, the proposed method does not use prior information about the signal and the noise morphologies, but it entirely adapts to the signal and the noise of the data. It does not require a manual search for adequate transforms that may sparsify the signal and the noise, in contrast to existing MCA-based methods. We develop an application of the proposed method for removing the mechanical noise from a marine seismic data set. For mechanical noise that is coherent in space and time, the results show that our method provides better denoising in comparison with the standard FX-Decon, FX-Cadzow, and the curvelet-based denoising methods.

Onboard de-noise processing for improving towed marine seismic acquisition efficiency

“…Many algorithms have been developed to tackle these problems. A few examples are: Sanchis et al (2011), Bekara et al (2010), Chen et al (2014) and Turquais et al (2017). Normally a combination of these techniques is used.…”

Imaging and seismic modelling inside volcanoes using machine learning

“…In geophysics, machine learning has been long established 22,23 , however, a suite of recent applications has appeared in the literature. These include seismic processing, automatic fault detection, noise suppression, micro-seismic detection, as well as diffraction identification [24][25][26][27][28][29] . Here we deploy a special type of neural network called a Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) which has been proposed to predict the results from a partial differential equation (operator) given an input model and initial conditions 30 .…”