2016
DOI: 10.4171/jems/602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coherent randomness tests and computing the $K$-trivial sets

Abstract: We show that a Martin-Löf random set for which the effective version of the Lebesgue density theorem fails computes every K-trivial set. Combined with a recent result by Day and Miller, this gives a positive solution to the ML-covering problem (Question 4.6 in Randomness and computability: Open questions. Bull. Symbolic Logic, 12 (3): 2006). On the other hand, we settle stronger variants of the covering problem in the negative. We show that any witness for the solution of the covering problem, namely an incom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Cantor space version follows immediately from the proof given in [3,Theorem 20]. Theorem 1.2 (Bienvenu, Greenberg, Kučera, Nies and Turetsky [2]). If X ∈ 2 ω is Martin-Löf random and not a density-one point, then X computes every K-trivial set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the Cantor space version follows immediately from the proof given in [3,Theorem 20]. Theorem 1.2 (Bienvenu, Greenberg, Kučera, Nies and Turetsky [2]). If X ∈ 2 ω is Martin-Löf random and not a density-one point, then X computes every K-trivial set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The present paper, combined with theorems of Bienvenu, Greenberg, Kučera, Nies and Turetsky [2], and Bienvenu, Hölzl, Miller and Nies [3,4], gives a strong affirmative answer to the covering problem:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theorem 6.2 has an interesting consequence. Bienvenu, et al [2] introduce Oberwolfach randomness and show that every Oberwolfach random real is a full density-one point. Based on earlier work by Figueira, Hirschfeldt, Miller, Ng, and Nies [7], they observe that one "half " of every Martin-Löf random real is always Oberwolfach random, hence full density-one 3 :…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus there are arbitrarily long strings α extending satisfying condition (1). To satisfy (2) and (3), we simply choose an α long enough and designate it F s+1 ( i). Proof.…”
Section: • the Measure Of [F T ( I)] Between F T ( ) And F T ( I) Is mentioning
confidence: 99%