2013
DOI: 10.1075/idj.20.2.02aca
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohesion in multimodal documents

Abstract: In multimodal documents, different types of cohesive or cross-reference link (i.e., signaling) are used in the text to link verbally coded content with the graphical material. In this study, we identify three types of reference, within the framework of previous work on cohesion (Halliday & Hasan, 1976): directive signaling, descriptive signaling, and no signaling in the text to introduce the figure. In an experimental study, we use eye tracking to investigate how those three reference types influence the proce… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is interesting to note that there has been surprisingly little work to date attempting to relate aspects of cohesion, the specific functional discourse phenomenon we employ below, and eye-tracking data, even with purely verbal texts. From the multimodal perspective relevant here, for example, Acartürk et al (2014) report on a study of the effects of different styles of cross-references to figures in a constructed "text"-"figure" composite layout. Although systematic differences in gaze behavior (particularly durations for attending to the text and to the visual figure) were found, the layouts of the stimuli used were highly unnatural and did not reflect the multimodal complexity of the kinds of data considered here.…”
Section: Brief Literature Review and State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is interesting to note that there has been surprisingly little work to date attempting to relate aspects of cohesion, the specific functional discourse phenomenon we employ below, and eye-tracking data, even with purely verbal texts. From the multimodal perspective relevant here, for example, Acartürk et al (2014) report on a study of the effects of different styles of cross-references to figures in a constructed "text"-"figure" composite layout. Although systematic differences in gaze behavior (particularly durations for attending to the text and to the visual figure) were found, the layouts of the stimuli used were highly unnatural and did not reflect the multimodal complexity of the kinds of data considered here.…”
Section: Brief Literature Review and State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%