2003
DOI: 10.1063/1.1533095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohesive failure of thin layers of soft model adhesives under tension

Abstract: The cohesive failure of soft adhesives is studied using a yield stress fluid as a model adhesive, which allow to relate the viscoelastic properties of the fluid directly to its adhesive performance. We derive a theoretical expression for the force-distance curve as a function of the yield stress, which describes our experimental results very well. The theoretical prediction is obtained by assuming a circular air-adhesive interface; surprisingly, good agreement between theory and experiment is also obtained whe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
170
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
9
170
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 25 and fingering instabilities can be observed from the very beginning of the stretching, leading to branched structures, as described in [21,2,9]. Clearly, such complex shapes cannot be obtained using Lagrangian models, the mesh distortion would be too large.…”
Section: Stretching Of a Filamentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fig. 25 and fingering instabilities can be observed from the very beginning of the stretching, leading to branched structures, as described in [21,2,9]. Clearly, such complex shapes cannot be obtained using Lagrangian models, the mesh distortion would be too large.…”
Section: Stretching Of a Filamentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This led to detailed instability criteria and descriptions and analysis of various trends (Coussot 1999, Fontana et al 2013, Ebrahimi et al 2016. The validation of these conclusions by confrontation with experimental data remains extremely limited, and when this was done a reasonable agreement for the finger size (Lindner et al 2000, Derks et al 2003, Maleki-Jirsaraei et al 2005, but a strong discrepancy was found concerning the instability criterion (Barral et al 2010), suggesting some important effect is missed.…”
Section: Saffman-taylor Instabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the nominal shear deformation exceeded 400 lm, some peeling processes are initiated at the rear edge of the contact. The peeling front shows a distinctive fingering pattern, which is reminiscent of Saffman-Taylor instabilities for liquids [16][17][18] or elastic instabilities for soft solids. 19,20 These fingering instabilities of the peel front are then associated with extensive deformation and orientation of the polymer chains in the direction of the motion of the shear device.…”
Section: In-situ Visualization Of Failure Mechanisms Under Steady Stamentioning
confidence: 99%