2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12540-020-00693-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohesive Zone Modeling of Crack Propagation in FCC Single Crystals via Atomistic Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that a similar observation is given based on the atomistic simulations in Ref. [31], where it was shown that the maximum normal stress arises behind the position of the virtual crack tip inside the cohesive zone. Note that the obtained SGET results do not contain paradoxes of the classical elasticity solution, where the assumed straight propagation of the crack cannot be validated by the criteria of the crack propagation direction [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that a similar observation is given based on the atomistic simulations in Ref. [31], where it was shown that the maximum normal stress arises behind the position of the virtual crack tip inside the cohesive zone. Note that the obtained SGET results do not contain paradoxes of the classical elasticity solution, where the assumed straight propagation of the crack cannot be validated by the criteria of the crack propagation direction [12].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This improvement of the classical asymptotic solution is similar to known results with moving Dugdale cracks [29] and the full-field classical solutions for brittle materials [30]. Moreover, the SGET solution predicts the maximum stress behind the crack tip (i.e., in the cohesion zone) that was observed recently within the atomistic simulations of the crack growth processes [31].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The crystallographic orientation of the newly formed plane corresponded to the (001) plane. The Cu specimen with a nanocrack under tension usually showed a clean plane caused by unstable crack growth, as reported in a previous study [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…However, the fracture toughness is established modeling a nano-crystal with a specific crack length and geometry that change from one investigation to other, therefore a fracture toughness that depends on the crack size is obtained, instead of a unique value that only depends on the material properties. The J -integral ( J ) is also an energy method that is extensively used to measure the fracture toughness [ 27 , 28 , 29 ]. Nevertheless, as other energy parameters, J lacks accuracy when irreversibility such as dislocations appear in the MD simulation [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%