2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2019.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomological characterizations of non-abelian extensions of strict Lie 2-algebras

Abstract: In this paper, we study non-abelian extensions of strict Lie 2-algebras via the cohomology theory. A non-abelian extension of a strict Lie 2-algebra g by h gives rise to a strict homomorphism from g to SOut(h). Conversely, we prove that the obstruction of existence of non-abelian extensions of strict Lie 2-algebras associated to a strict Lie 2-algebra homomorphism from g to SOut(h) is given by an element in the third cohomology group. We further prove that the isomorphism classes of non-abelian extensions of s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actions of crossed modules of different structures have also been described in terms of equations, as it can be checked in [10] for crossed modules of groups, in [8], [11] or [31] for crossed modules of Lie algebras, and in [7] for crossed modules of Leibniz algebras. Bearing those examples in mind, it is seemingly reasonable to address the problem by following the next steps: firstly, we consider a homomorphism from (M, P, η) to Act(L, D, µ) = (Tetra(D, L), Tetra(L, D, µ), ∆), and translate into equations every property satisfied by that homomorphism.…”
Section: The Actormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actions of crossed modules of different structures have also been described in terms of equations, as it can be checked in [10] for crossed modules of groups, in [8], [11] or [31] for crossed modules of Lie algebras, and in [7] for crossed modules of Leibniz algebras. Bearing those examples in mind, it is seemingly reasonable to address the problem by following the next steps: firstly, we consider a homomorphism from (M, P, η) to Act(L, D, µ) = (Tetra(D, L), Tetra(L, D, µ), ∆), and translate into equations every property satisfied by that homomorphism.…”
Section: The Actormentioning
confidence: 99%