2007
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2007.11.1255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomological estimates for cat(X,ξ)

Abstract: This paper studies the homotopy invariant cat.X; / introduced by the first author in [6]. Given a finite cell-complex X , we study the function 7 ! cat.X; / where varies in the cohomology space H 1 .X I ‫./ޒ‬ Note that cat.X; / turns into the classical Lusternik-Schnirelmann category cat.X / in the case D 0. Interest in cat.X; / is based on its applications in dynamics where it enters estimates of complexity of the chain recurrent set of a flow admitting Lyapunov closed 1-forms, see [6; 7].In this paper we sig… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the Morse inequalities of a Morse closed 1-form, cat(X, ξ) is applicable to more degenerate conditions, but in general it is harder to compute. In [5,6] Farber and Schütz improve the previous results and give more detailed insights on this issue.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Compared to the Morse inequalities of a Morse closed 1-form, cat(X, ξ) is applicable to more degenerate conditions, but in general it is harder to compute. In [5,6] Farber and Schütz improve the previous results and give more detailed insights on this issue.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Finally, we compute cat 1 (X, ξ ) for products of surfaces as function of the cohomology class ξ ∈ H 1 (X; R). We compare our results with the computations of the invariant cat(X, ξ ) completed in [9]. We conclude that cat 1 (X, ξ ) may exceed cat(X, ξ ) by an arbitrarily large amount.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In order to show that the difference between them can be arbitrarily large, we have to introduce a controlled version of cat 1 (X, ξ ) which behaves better under cartesian products. The following discussion is very similar to [9,Section 9]. Let ω be a continuous closed 1-form on a finite cell complex X.…”
Section: A Controlled Version Of Cat 1 (X ξ )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we discuss results of this type for cat(X, ξ) following our paper [24]; some lower bounds for cat(X, ξ) were obtained earlier in the papers [15] and [18]. We give in this section the main definitions, state principal results and illustrate them by several specific examples; however for complete proofs we refer the reader to our original papers [24], [25] and [23]. Let X be a finite polyhedron and ξ ∈ H 1 (X; R).…”
Section: Cohomological Estimates For Cat(x ξ)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N ⊂X is a connected neighborhood of infinity with respect to χ, see §2 of [24] and Lemma 5.2 from [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%