2012
DOI: 10.4171/ggd/169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomological invariants and the classifying space for proper actions

Abstract: We investigate two open questions in a cohomology theory relative to the family of finite subgroups. The problem of whether the Fcohomological dimension is subadditive is reduced to extensions by groups of prime order. We show that every finitely generated regular branch group has infinite rational cohomological dimension. Moreover, we prove that the first Grigorchuk group G is not contained in Kropholler's class HF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gorenstein cohomological dimension of G over double-struckZ enjoys several useful properties and is proposed in to serve as an algebraic invariant whose finiteness characterizes the groups which admit a finite‐dimensional model for the classifying space for proper actions. It is related to many other numerical invariants that are studied in cohomological group theory: As shown in , for any group G we have a chain of inequalities Gcddouble-struckZGFcddouble-struckZGcdfrakturFGgdfrakturFGmaxfalse{3,cdFGfalse}.Here, Fcddouble-struckZG is the so‐called frakturF‐cohomological dimension of G over double-struckZ, which is defined in terms of relative homological algebra, relative to the class frakturF of finite subgroups of G. The Bredon cohomological dimension cdfrakturFG of G is defined in terms of the category of all contravariant functors from the orbit category OfrakturFG to the category of abelian groups and gdfrakturFG denotes the geometric Bredon dimension, that is, the minimal dimension of a model for the classifying space for proper actions of G.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Gorenstein cohomological dimension of G over double-struckZ enjoys several useful properties and is proposed in to serve as an algebraic invariant whose finiteness characterizes the groups which admit a finite‐dimensional model for the classifying space for proper actions. It is related to many other numerical invariants that are studied in cohomological group theory: As shown in , for any group G we have a chain of inequalities Gcddouble-struckZGFcddouble-struckZGcdfrakturFGgdfrakturFGmaxfalse{3,cdFGfalse}.Here, Fcddouble-struckZG is the so‐called frakturF‐cohomological dimension of G over double-struckZ, which is defined in terms of relative homological algebra, relative to the class frakturF of finite subgroups of G. The Bredon cohomological dimension cdfrakturFG of G is defined in terms of the category of all contravariant functors from the orbit category OfrakturFG to the category of abelian groups and gdfrakturFG denotes the geometric Bredon dimension, that is, the minimal dimension of a model for the classifying space for proper actions of G.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gorenstein cohomological dimension of G over Z enjoys several useful properties and is proposed in [4] to serve as an algebraic invariant whose finiteness characterizes the groups which admit a finite-dimensional model for the classifying space for proper actions. It is related to many other numerical invariants that are studied in cohomological group theory: As shown in [15,24,26], for any group G we have a chain of inequalities…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a finitely generated countable group G has an embedding G × G ֒→ G (e.g. the finitely presented "Thompson's group F ") then it has infinite rational cohomological dimension [22], so the contractibility hypothesis already excludes some "reasonable" countable groups from being autoequivalence groups.…”
Section: Stability Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also has jump cohomology of height one over Q (see [13,Theorem 4.11]). Yet this group has jump cohomology of height zero.…”
Section: Jump (Co)homologymentioning
confidence: 99%