2003
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-0215-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohomology Rings of Finite Groups

Abstract: of the hardcover 1st edition 2003 No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. To our loved ones 37 7. Group Cohomology and Change of Coefficients 44 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The theory of support varieties played a key role in the classification of endotrivial modules over p-groups and it is a necessary ingredient in two of the constructions that appear in Sections 5 and 6. The books [5] and [14] serve as references for this material.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory of support varieties played a key role in the classification of endotrivial modules over p-groups and it is a necessary ingredient in two of the constructions that appear in Sections 5 and 6. The books [5] and [14] serve as references for this material.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whenever there is more than one place to find a theorem and its proof, we refer to the original paper although it may not be the easiest source to find. Many of the old results that we quote in the paper can also be found in the books by Benson [1], [2] and Carlson [7], [8].…”
Section: Theorem 12 Let ζ ∈ Hmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Observe that if (H 1 , H 2 ) and (H 1 , H 2 ) are two different choices of homotopies satisfying the equations in (8), then the differences H 1 − H 1 and H 2 − H 2 are chain maps. We will see below that, up to chain maps, the homotopies H 1 and H 2 can be chosen to satisfy certain identities.…”
Section: Lemma 52 There Are Homotopy Equivalencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The element ζ annihilates the cohomology of M if and only if L ζ ⊗ M ∼ = Ω n M ⊕ ΩM ⊕ P where P is some projective module. See Section 9.7 of [8]. From the same source we have that if p > 2 and if ζ ∈ H * (G, k) with n even, then ζ annihilates the cohomology of L ζ .…”
Section: Lemma 34 Suppose That We Have An Exact Sequencementioning
confidence: 92%
“…We use standard facts and notation of the stable module category of kG [7], support varieties [2,8], and of almost split sequences [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%