2007
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort Profile: Cohort of Norway (CONOR)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
202
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
202
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The details of both these cohorts have been described previously [16,17]. In brief, CONOR is a collaborative project between the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and universities in Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim, and Tromsø, where data from 10 regional health surveys have been combined into one national database.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of both these cohorts have been described previously [16,17]. In brief, CONOR is a collaborative project between the Norwegian Institute of Public Health and universities in Oslo, Bergen, Trondheim, and Tromsø, where data from 10 regional health surveys have been combined into one national database.…”
Section: Study Design and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that the majority of excess risk associated with having both conditions, compared to neither condition, was mediated through HDL-C and nonHDL-C. HDL-C and nonHDL-C are both highly related to triglyceride levels and to an enlarged waist circumference [17]. Also, HDL-C and nonHDL-C provide important information about underlying lipoprotein metabolism in which the need for additional consideration of triglyceride levels becomes less important [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants in at least one population-based regional health screening of Cohort Norway (CONOR) between 1994 and 2003 formed the baseline of the prospective study, details of which are described elsewhere [17,18]. Of a total of 309,742 invitations for CONOR study participation, 59% (181,891) participated, of whom 173,243 men and women attended at least one health screening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actuellement, l'épidémiologie fait face à la nécessité de développer des études d'une taille autrefois inimaginable. Qu'il s'agisse de mettre en évidence des risques de faible ampleur associés à l'exposition à des agents potentiellement pathogènes, d'évaluer l'efficacité d'interventions dont on attend des bénéfices d'ampleur modeste, ou de décrire la distribution et l'évolution d'événements peu fréquents, ce sont aujourd'hui des études cas-témoins en [2], le projet UK Biobank [3] qui a mis en place le suivi prospectif de 500 000 personnes, et la Norvegian Mother and Child Cohort Study qui a inclus 100 000 femmes à la 18 e semaine de grossesse puis leurs 100 000 nouveau-nés, ainsi que 70 000 pères, soit au total 270 000 personnes [4]. La Nurses' Health Study a été mise en place aux États-Unis dès 1976 et assure le suivi prospectif de près de 250 000 infirmières [5].…”
Section: Le Principe Des Cohortes éPidémiologiquesunclassified