2014
DOI: 10.1186/2050-6511-15-17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cohort protocol paper: The Pain and Opioids In Treatment (POINT) study

Abstract: BackgroundInternationally, there is concern about the increased prescribing of pharmaceutical opioids for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP). In part, this is related to limited knowledge about the long-term benefits and outcomes of opioid use for CNCP. There has also been increased injection of some pharmaceutical opioids by people who inject drugs, and for some patients, the development of problematic and/or dependent use. To date, much of the research on the use of pharmaceutical opioids among people with CNCP,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Full details of the specific measures used in the POINT baseline interview are described elsewhere (Campbell et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Full details of the specific measures used in the POINT baseline interview are described elsewhere (Campbell et al, 2014b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to facilitate ascertainment of pain conditions, a glossary of conditions that may lead to chronic pain was developed (see glossaries in Campbell et al (2014b)). Questions were taken from the Chronic Conditions section of the CIDI 3.0 (Kessler and Ustun, 2004).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Pain and Opioids IN Treatment (POINT) study is a prospective cohort study of 1514 people across Australia who have been prescribed opioids for CNCP (a full description of the cohort methodology has been published elsewhere 21 ). Data were collected via telephone interview with a researcher.…”
Section: Study Design and Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,873 participants were deemed eligible (90%) and 1,514 completed the baseline interview (81%). Full details of the recruitment methods are published elsewhere (13).…”
Section: Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%